Article Gold Open Access 2025

Constraints, mechanisms, and strategies for industry-education integration in vocational education: An empirical study

PLOS ONE
Journal · Vol. 20 · Issue 12 December · Art. e0339158
Abstract

Identifying the constraints hindering industry-education integration (IEI) in vocational education is a critical prerequisite for promoting its high-quality development. However, existing research has yet to establish a systematic solution to this core issue. Therefore, this study takes Shenzhen, China, as a case study and adopts an empirical research approach to construct an analytical framework of “factor identification-mechanism analysis-strategy formulation,” aiming to thoroughly investigate the key constraints on IEI development in vocational education. First, based on a literature review and questionnaire survey, the study identifies 12 critical constraining factors of IEI. Subsequently, through expert interviews and Interpretative Structural Modelling (ISM), it reveals the underlying mechanisms of these constraints, classifying the 12 factors into five hierarchical levels. These factors form 16 constraint pathways, with inadequate policies, weak foundations for school-enterprise collaboration, insufficient institutional commitment, and ineffective communication mechanisms identified as critical bottom-level factors. These indirectly influence intermediate factors such as hardware/software conditions, alignment of talent cultivation philosophies, education-market demand matching, collaboration channel efficiency, and stakeholder interest fulfillment. Consequently, they diminish corporate engagement enthusiasm, blur responsibility-rights boundaries between stakeholders, and dampen faculty participation motivation, ultimately impeding IEI progress. Finally, the study proposes targeted countermeasures, emphasizing tripartite collaboration among the government, vocational institutions, and enterprises. Key strategies include strengthening legal safeguards, consolidating industry-education collaboration foundations, and proactively fulfilling educational responsibilities. The findings resolve the dilemmas constraining IEI development, providing policymakers with evidence-based references and offering practical guidance for deeper collaboration between vocational institutions and enterprises. This study holds significant theoretical and practical value for advancing high-quality vocational education. © 2025 Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

China human procedures questionnaire Humans Surveys and Questionnaires Article interview Vocational education education government empirical research empiricism evidence based practice industry open access publishing participation organization and management
Author Affiliations
School of Construction Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
School of Construction Engineering, Guangzhou Vocational University of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, China
College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Funding & Acknowledgements
Shenzhen Polytechnic, SZPT
Grant: 7023310184
Funding: We declare that this research received no additional external funding beyond the support from the projects (the Education Science Planning Project of Shenzhen [grant number yb24026]; the Foundation for University-Industry Collaborative Education Program, PRC [grant number 2023122865621]; the Shenzhen Polytechnic University Fund [grant number 7023310184]; the Research Projects of Department of Education of Guangdong Province [grant number 2023WCXTD037]; and the Guangdong Provincial Higher Vocational Education Teaching Reform Research and Practice Project [grant number 2023JG355]).
Department of Education of Guangdong Province, DEGP
Grant: 2023WCXTD037
Funding: We declare that this research received no additional external funding beyond the support from the projects (the Education Science Planning Project of Shenzhen [grant number yb24026]; the Foundation for University-Industry Collaborative Education Program, PRC [grant number 2023122865621]; the Shenzhen Polytechnic University Fund [grant number 7023310184]; the Research Projects of Department of Education of Guangdong Province [grant number 2023WCXTD037]; and the Guangdong Provincial Higher Vocational Education Teaching Reform Research and Practice Project [grant number 2023JG355]).
Grant: 2023122865621
Funding: We declare that this research received no additional external funding beyond the support from the projects (the Education Science Planning Project of Shenzhen [grant number yb24026]; the Foundation for University-Industry Collaborative Education Program, PRC [grant number 2023122865621]; the Shenzhen Polytechnic University Fund [grant number 7023310184]; the Research Projects of Department of Education of Guangdong Province [grant number 2023WCXTD037]; and the Guangdong Provincial Higher Vocational Education Teaching Reform Research and Practice Project [grant number 2023JG355]).
Grant: 2023JG355
Funding: We declare that this research received no additional external funding beyond the support from the projects (the Education Science Planning Project of Shenzhen [grant number yb24026]; the Foundation for University-Industry Collaborative Education Program, PRC [grant number 2023122865621]; the Shenzhen Polytechnic University Fund [grant number 7023310184]; the Research Projects of Department of Education of Guangdong Province [grant number 2023WCXTD037]; and the Guangdong Provincial Higher Vocational Education Teaching Reform Research and Practice Project [grant number 2023JG355]).
Grant: yb24026
Funding: We declare that this research received no additional external funding beyond the support from the projects (the Education Science Planning Project of Shenzhen [grant number yb24026]; the Foundation for University-Industry Collaborative Education Program, PRC [grant number 2023122865621]; the Shenzhen Polytechnic University Fund [grant number 7023310184]; the Research Projects of Department of Education of Guangdong Province [grant number 2023WCXTD037]; and the Guangdong Provincial Higher Vocational Education Teaching Reform Research and Practice Project [grant number 2023JG355]).
References 10 References
1 Lin, Han, Megaproject responsible innovation: Concept, framework, and governance, Frontiers of Engineering Management, 12, 3, pp. 653-668, (2025)
2 Yu, Chenzi, Labor agglomeration, industrial structure upgrading and low-carbon economic development, Finance Research Letters, 74, (2025)
3 Dai, Li, Does vocational education pay off in China? Evidence from city-level education supply shocks, Economic Modelling, 140, (2024)
4 Yasdin, Yasdin, Policies and politics development of vocational education in Indonesia: a historical perspective, Asian Education and Development Studies, 12, 4-5, pp. 297-309, (2023)
5 Kemper, Johanna, Evaluating the impact of general versus vocational education on labor market outcomes in Egypt by means of a regression discontinuity design, Journal of Development Economics, 166, (2024)
6 Li, Huiping, Evaluation system of vocational education construction in China based on linked TOPSIS analysis, Heliyon, 10, 21, (2024)
7 He, Zhenhua, A study of Inter-Technology Information Management (ITIM) system for industry-education integration, Heliyon, 9, 9, (2023)
8 Gong, Xianwen, Performance evaluation of industry-education integration in higher education from the perspective of coupling coordination-an empirical study based on Chongqing, PLoS ONE, 19, 9 September, (2024)
9 Li, Yuqian, Evaluation Study on the Ecosystem Governance of Industry–Education Integration Platform in China, Sustainability (Switzerland), 14, 20, (2022)
10 Shou, Songtao, Exploring the collaborative innovation operational model of government-industry-education synergy: a case study of BYD in China, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 33, 2, pp. 389-424, (2025)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers