Article Gold Open Access 2024

Examining the utilization of web-based discussion tools in teaching and learning organic chemistry in selected Rwandan secondary schools

Heliyon
Journal · Vol. 10 · Issue 20 · Art. e39356
Abstract

In recent years, the teaching and learning of organic chemistry have frequently faced challenges due to limited student engagement and participation. Consequently, there is a growing demand for innovative teaching methods to tackle these issues. In this context, web-based discussions have emerged as a hopeful approach to enhance students' engagement and foster critical thinking skills. Therefore, the present study investigated the level of adoption of web-based discussion tools in teaching organic chemistry in Rwandan secondary schools for addressing the challenge of limited student engagement and participation. A quantitative research approach relying on a survey questionnaire was used to collect data from 133 secondary school chemistry teachers in Kamonyi and Gasabo districts. The findings indicate that 78 % of teachers do not use web-based discussion tools, while 22 % have integrated these tools into their teaching. The preferred platforms among users include WhatsApp groups, Google Docs, and Google Classroom. Additionally, the study highlights key organic chemistry topics such as alkanes, polymers, polymerization, and alcohol that can be effectively taught through these tools. Statistical analysis using ANCOVA did not show significant differences in the use of web-based discussion tools based on factors like school location, teachers’ age, school ownership, and teaching experience, with p-values of 0.817, 0.234, 0.380, and 0.051, respectively. However, the borderline significance related to teaching experience (p = 0.051) suggests a potential trend. A significant difference was observed in terms of gender, with male teachers more likely to use these tools (p = 0.015). The study offers valuable insights into the factors influencing the adoption of web-based discussion tools in Rwanda, offering useful guidance for educators and curriculum developers to create more engaging and inclusive chemistry lessons. © 2024 The Authors

Keywords

Author Keywords

learning experience And active participation Innovative teaching approaches Organic chemistry Utilization Web-based discussion

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
University of Rwanda, Butare, Rwanda, African Center for Excellence for Innovative in Teaching and Learning Mathematics and Science (ACEITLMS), Rwanda
Funding & Acknowledgements
Grant: 109–111
From Tables 2 and it is important to acknowledge that demographic factors may significantly influence this study. Specifically, gender, geographical location, school ownership, work experience, and age are important characteristics to examine, as they can substantially impact the adoption and effectiveness of web-based discussion tools. In this regard, gender might reveal differences in access and attitudes towards technology, while location (per-urban, rural, urban) can highlight disparities in technological infrastructure and resources. Furthermore, school ownership (government-aided, government, private) can affect the availability of funds and support for technology integration. Moreover, the working experience and age of participants are essential to understand varying levels of comfort and familiarity with web-based tools, as more experienced or older teachers might have different perspectives compared to their younger or less experienced counterparts. Thus, by examining these variables, the study can provide a comprehensive understanding of the factors that enhance or hinder the use of web-based discussion tools, leading to more targeted and effective interventions.The results found that Google Classroom and Google Docs are among popular web-based discussion tools used by chemistry teachers in teaching organic chemistry. This preference is likely due to the strong, collaborative features these platforms offer. This was confirmed by the study conducted Yilmaz and Yasar [106] which found that user-friendly interfaces and collaborative features of Google platforms and Docs make them attractive choices for teachers. Agustina and Purnawarman [107] explained that Google Classroom facilitates seamless assignment distribution, feedback, and communication. Similarly, Google Docs is highly used by many chemistry teachers because it supports real-time collaboration and editing, allowing students and teachers to jointly construct and refine complex chemical structures and mechanisms, and foster a deeper understanding through interactive engagement [108]. The studies highlighted that these tools not only enhance student participation but also support the diverse learning paces and styles within a classroom setting [109\u2013111].The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Aloys Iyamuremye reports administrative support and writing assistance were provided by University of Rwanda College of Education. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References 10 References
1 Uworwabayeho, Alphonse, Developing the capacity of education local leaders for sustaining professional learning communities in Rwanda, Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 2, 1, (2020)
2 Bretz, Stacey Lowery, Novak's theory of education: Human constructivism and meaningful learning, Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 8, (2001)
3 Yan, Fan, Students’ Ideas about How and Why Chemical Reactions Happen: Mapping the conceptual landscape, International Journal of Science Education, 37, 18, pp. 3066-3092, (2015)
4 DeHaan, Robert L., The impending revolution in undergraduate science education, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 2, pp. 253-269, (2005)
5 Reid, Norman, The role of laboratory work in university chemistry, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 2, pp. 172-185, (2007)
6 Visualization in Science Education, (2005)
7 Tien, Lydia T., Implementation of a peer-led team learning instructional approach in an undergraduate organic chemistry course, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 7, pp. 606-632, (2002)
8 McCreary, Christine L., Peer instruction in the general chemistry laboratory: Assessment of student learning, Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 5, pp. 804-810, (2006)
9 Fautch, Jessica M., The flipped classroom for teaching organic chemistry in small classes: Is it effective?, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 1, pp. 179-186, (2015)
10 Dehghan, Shoaleh, Investigating the Impact of the Flipped Classroom on Student Learning and Enjoyment in an Organic Chemistry Course, Journal of Chemical Education, 99, 7, pp. 2512-2519, (2022)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
6
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers