Article 2024

Examining workplace affordances within work-study programmes for becoming an engineer

Journal of Workplace Learning
Journal · Vol. 36 · Issue 8 · pp. 692-708
Abstract

Purpose: Work-study programmes aim to support young adults transitioning from tertiary education to work and contribute to enhancing their employability. The purpose of this study is to provide a detailed analysis of the learning experiences of trainees in work-study programmes within the broad field of engineering. Design/methodology/approach: The data gathering procedures used interviews with participants of a specific work-study programme and conducting thematic analyses to identify and understand the motivations of these adults for enrolling in work-study programmes and their associated workplace learning experiences. Fifty-two alumni of electrical and logistics engineering programmes completed 12 months of a separate work-study programme and consented to participate in an hour-long interview. They elaborated upon their work-learn experiences to explicate their work-learn needs and challenges in those interviews. Findings: Findings include workplaces facilitated skills development through providing combinations of work tasks comprising both routine and novel work assignments; challenging circumstances at the workplace provided trainees with opportunities to develop adaptive capacities; and engaging in non-routine work processes fosters integration into the engineering workplace community. Originality/value: The findings contribute to the existing literature by exemplifying how routine engineering activities are practical affordances through which engineering trainees construct knowledge and dispositions for engaging in challenging, non-routine engineering work. Such experiences are crucial in preparing trainees for advanced roles in logistics or electronic sectors. © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Keywords

Author Keywords

workplace learning qualitative work integrated learning Professional Development Engineering practices Routine work

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
School of Education and Professional Studies, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Centre for Research and Development in Learning, Singapore City, Singapore
Funding & Acknowledgements
Grant: GA19-10
The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding support provided by the Workforce Development Applied Research Fund (WDARF), offered by the SkillsFuture Singapore Agency under Grant [GA19-10]. Also, author acknowledge the research assistance provided by Cheryl Ong Siow Bin, Natasha Tan and Anh Hai Le and the many contributions of the informants who they interviewed.
References 10 References
1 Bailey, Reid, Effects of industrial experience and coursework during sophomore and junior years on student learning of engineering design, Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, 7, pp. 662-667, (2007)
2 Billett, Stephen Richard, Learning through work: Workplace affordances and individual engagement, Journal of Workplace Learning, 13, 5, pp. 209-214, (2001)
3 Billett, Stephen Richard, Pedagogic Practices Supporting the Integration of Experiences, Professional and Practice-based Learning, 13, pp. 195-223, (2015)
4 Billett, Stephen Richard, Augmenting post-practicum experiences: Purposes and practices, Professional and Practice-based Learning, 25, pp. 3-25, (2019)
5 Integrating Analyses in Mixed Methods Research, (2018)
6 Review of University Industry Collaboration in Teaching and Learning, (2021)
7 Björck, Ville, Problematising the theory–practice terminology: a discourse analysis of students’ statements on Work-integrated Learning, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43, 10, pp. 1363-1375, (2019)
8 Braun, Virginia, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2, pp. 77-101, (2006)
9 Education for Employability, (2019)
10 Bishop, Dan, Affordance, agency and apprenticeship learning: a comparative study of small and large engineering firms, Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 22, 1, pp. 68-86, (2017)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers