Article 2024

Modern Apprenticeship Talent Development Model and Training Quality: A Systematic Literature Review

International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management
Journal · Vol. 30 · Issue 4 · pp. 194-213
Abstract

The alignment of educational frameworks with industry requirements has increasingly been facilitated through contemporary apprenticeship models, yet persistent doubts regarding their quality continue to surface. Existing scholarship has drawn attention to issues such as limited success rates and the tendency for apprenticeships to function as a source of inexpensive labour rather than genuine learning opportunities. To address these concerns, this systematic review examined 20 peer-reviewed publications indexed in Scopus and Web of Science, applying a rigorous selection and evaluation process. The synthesis of findings revealed eleven principal theoretical foundations and conceptual models shaping current discourse on apprenticeships. Recent investigations have broadened the debate by incorporating multiple perspectives and considering outcomes for diverse groups, including learners, educators, and employers. A recurring theme within the literature is the necessity of robust quality management, which depends upon structured curricula and the professional preparation of mentors. Equally significant is the partnership between small and medium-sized enterprises and public authorities, which plays a decisive role in sustaining programme relevance and supporting apprentices’ personal development, particularly during periods of economic uncertainty. Overall, the evidence underscores the urgency of implementing forward-looking strategies that guarantee the integrity and long-term viability of apprenticeship systems internationally. © 2024, International Forum of Management Scholars. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Training quality Modern Apprenticeship SLR Talent Development Model

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Faculty of Social Sciences and Liberal Arts, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Ajzen, Icek, The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 2, pp. 179-211, (1991)
2 Bates, Reid A., A critical analysis of evaluation practice: The Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence, Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 3, pp. 341-347, (2004)
3 Betsworth, Deborah G., Vocational Interests: A Look at the Past 70 Years and a Glance at the Future, Career Development Quarterly, 46, 1, pp. 23-47, (1997)
4 Bildung in Deutschland 2010, (2010)
5 Böhn, Svenja, Dropout from initial vocational training – A meta-synthesis of reasons from the apprentice's point of view, Educational Research Review, 35, (2022)
6 Brockmann, Michaela, ‘Invested’ partnerships as key to high quality apprenticeship programmes as evidenced in on and off the job training, Journal of Education and Work, 36, 3, pp. 220-236, (2023)
7 Manual for the Svib Scii, (2025)
8 Cavaglia, Chiara, Do Apprenticeships Pay? Evidence for England, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82, 5, pp. 1094-1134, (2020)
9 Chen, Wei, Evaluation of Talent Cultivation Quality of Modern Apprenticeship Based on Context-Input-Process-Product Model, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16, 4, pp. 197-212, (2021)
10 China Briefing, (2021)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers