Article Gold Open Access 2025

Bridging gaps in vocational education and training systems in Norway

Journal of Vocational Education and Training
Journal · Vol. 77 · Issue 2 · pp. 503-521
Abstract

More than half of the youth in upper-secondary education in Norway choose programmes in vocational education and training. There is a larger risk of marginalisation in VET than in other educational programmes. One challenge facing VET is the mismatch between students’ vocational education and the companies` need for apprenticeships. It is found that a great number of students lack apprenticeship after the second year in school, another matter of concern is the related risk of marginalisation connected to students’ social backgrounds. We explore how a local vocational education and training (VET) system in Norway addresses the risk of marginalisation. With a focus on marginalisation and Luhmann’s system theory lens, we understand that a local VET is divided into several more or less autopoietic subsystems which communicate different meanings regarding the risk of marginalisation. We investigate how marginalisation is addressed within different subsystems in VET, by using a case study that includes interviews with important stakeholders at an upper-secondary school, a training agency, and companies. The results from the case study reveal that different rationalities may lead to difficulties in constructing integration between education and the labour market. However, through communication, ideas can be translated and overbridge system differentiation and mutual communication regarding how marginalisation can be decreased. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

vocational education and training marginalisation organising system

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Teacher Education, Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, Trondheim, Trondelag, Norway
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Vocations and Learning, (2008)
2 Sluttrapport, (2016)
3 Baeck, Unn Doris K., Spatial Manoeuvring in Education: Educational Experiences and Local Opportunity Structures among Rural Youth in Norway, Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 3, 3, pp. 61-74, (2019)
4 Niklas Luhmann Education as A Social System, (2017)
5 Beach, Dennis, From learning to labour to learning for marginality: School segregation and marginalization in Swedish suburbs, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32, 2, pp. 257-274, (2011)
6 Organization of Hypocrisy Talk Decisions and Actions in Organizations, (2002)
7 European Qualifications Framework
8 Ceelen, Lieke, Pedagogic practices in the context of students’ workplace learning: a literature review, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 75, 4, pp. 810-842, (2023)
9 de Witte, Kristof, Dropout from Secondary Education: All's well that begins well, European Journal of Education, 48, 1, pp. 131-149, (2013)
10 Esmond, Bill, ‘They get a qualification at the end of it, I think’: incidental workplace learning and technical education in England, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 70, 2, pp. 193-211, (2018)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
5
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers