Conference paper 2025

Innovative Learning: Integrating Design Thinking, Experimental Design and Artificial Intelligence for Next-Gen Engineering Education in the Context of Industry 5.0

IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON
Conference
Abstract

Achieving quality education is fundamental to enhancing individuals' lives and fostering sustainable development. By 2030, it is anticipated that the percentage of students attaining basic literacy levels by the end of primary school will rise from 51% in 2015 to 67%. In Mexico, 13.8% of young people face educational disadvantages, underscoring the urgent need for improvement. In this context, Industry 5.0 encompasses the collaboration between advanced technologies-such as Artificial Intelligence (AI)- and human expertise, including educators and students, to enhance the efficiency of teaching and learning. This paper aims to propose and validate a five-step methodology that integrates Design Thinking, Design of Experiments, and Artificial Intelligence to address a real-world challenge presented by a non-governmental organization (NGO). The challenge involves designing, constructing, and validating individual chairs and tables for 14 girls aged between 3 and 8 years, who are in vulnerable situations in Torreón. The research was conducted during the Design of Experiments for Engineering Innovation course at Tecnológico de Monterrey, involving 57 second-year engineering students. Students employed a 2k factorial design to optimize materials and structures, while AI tools enriched the processes of ideation, visualization, and prototype validation characteristic of Design Thinking. This methodological combination fosters innovation and sustainability in applied engineering. The findings demonstrate students' deep understanding of the significance of integrating these three approaches to tackle realworld problems with substantial social impact. First, significant differences were found in the level of understanding before and after the course regarding the Design Thinking (d=-1.875; p < 0.05), Design of Experiments (d=-2.232; p<0.05), Sustainability (d=-1.142; p <0.05), and Artificial Intelligence (d=-1.143; p < 0.05) approaches. Second, between 80% and 90% of students considered the integration of Design Thinking, Design of Experiments, sustainability, and AI to be quite or extremely useful across all dimensions. It was also observed that the learning dimensions most impacted by the proposed methodologies were innovation (96.4%), multidisciplinary work (96.4%), and the capacity to solve real-world problems (96.4%). Likewise, 87.5% of students believed that the integration of the methodologies had a significant or exceptional impact on the development of the challenge. Furthermore, this research contributes to the academic discourse by presenting a concrete case study of education in the context of Education 5.0 and Industry 5.0, highlighting novel pedagogical strategies, the adoption and integration of technology, as well as active, challenge-based, and personalized learning. It also emphasizes social and emotional development, sustainability, and collaborative partnerships. Collectively, this research offers a valuable and timely perspective on the application of Industry 5.0 in education, considering the technological evolution associated with this new industrial era. © 2025 IEEE.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Artificial intelligence Problem solving education design thinking Industry 5.0 Sustainable development Design of Experiments Innovative Learning

Index Keywords

Teaching Curricula Engineering education Sustainable development Technical presentations Education computing Students Problem solving Problem-solving Engineering research Design thinking Industry 5.0 Design of experiments Me-xico Quality education Innovative learning Ecodesign Integrating design Primary schools Real-world problem Thinking design
Author Affiliations
School of Engineering Sciences, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NLE, Mexico
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Davidson, Janelle Margaret, Lean Six Sigma and quality frameworks in higher education – a review of literature, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11, 6, pp. 1005-1018, (2020)
2 Dykhnych, Liudmyla, Effectiveness of the Use of Creative Projects as a Way to Develop Creative Design Thinking of Higher Education Students, Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22, 12, pp. 133-140, (2022)
3 Mohamed Hashim, Mohamed Ashmel, Higher education via the lens of industry 5.0: Strategy and perspective, Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 9, (2024)
4 Padovano, Antonio, Towards human-AI collaboration in the competency-based curriculum development process: The case of industrial engineering and management education, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, (2024)
5 International Journal of Technology and Design Education, (2024)
6 Design Thinking for Educators, (2023)
7 Baricevic Debelec, Martina, From Active Learning to Innovative Thinking: The Influence of Learning the Design Thinking Process among Students, Education Sciences, 13, 5, (2023)
8 Doss, Tamer Panagiotis, Education for Industry 5.0 and ESD: Co-Creation of Engineering Design Challenges with Industry, IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, (2024)
9 Mengalli, Neli Maria, Creation of digital solutions in higher education: Strategies with hands-on and disruptive technologies in phygital transformation, Perspectives on Enhancing Learning Experience Through Digital Strategy in Higher Education, pp. 1-30, (2023)
10 Ciolacu, Monica Ionita, Does Industry 5.0 Need an Engineering Education 5.0? Exploring Potentials and Challenges in the Age of Generative AI, IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, (2024)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers