Article Gold Open Access 2025

Optimization Student Learning Outcomes Through Hyflex Learning Based on Student Engagement

Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education
Journal · Vol. 7 · Issue 3 · pp. 427-440
Abstract

Student engagement is an important factor in determining learning outcomes, but in online learning in particular, many obstacles are still faced. On the other hand, studies on the implementation of effective online learning are still limited. This study presents an empirical synthesis of the relationship between student engagement and learning outcomes in HyFlex through a random effects meta-analysis supported by a student survey. The meta-analysis results estimated via OpenMEE show a positive and significant overall effect. There was very high heterogeneity between studies, but subgroup analysis by education level showed no significant differences. Diagnostic publication bias indicated asymmetry, but the large Rosenthal fail-safe N value, supported the stability of the findings. Survey data showed an average of 81% positive responses in synchronous and asynchronous modes, including active participation, material comprehension, frequent access to asynchronous material, and task completion support. Respondents also rated learning interaction, learning atmosphere, self-motivation, and self-discipline as the main factors driving engagement. Overall, these findings confirm that student engagement are key determinants of learning outcomes in HyFlex, and emphasize the need for HyFlex designs that emphasize meaningful interaction, accessible media, and self-regulation support. Further research is needed to test contextual moderators and clarify the conditions that most support the effectiveness of HyFlex Learning.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Student engagement HyFlex learning learning outcomes meta-analysis quantitative survey

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Curriculum and Instructional Technology, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia
Department of Information Technology Education, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia
Funding & Acknowledgements
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, LPPM
Funding Statement: The author would like to thank LPPM Undiksha for funding this research through the Ganesha University of Education DIPA program with letter number 334/UN48.16/LT/2024.
Grant: 334/UN48.16/LT/2024
Funding Statement: The author would like to thank LPPM Undiksha for funding this research through the Ganesha University of Education DIPA program with letter number 334/UN48.16/LT/2024.
References 10 References
1 Abadi, Arad, Meta-analysis, Handbook for Designing and Conducting Clinical and Translational Surgery, pp. 235-239, (2023)
2 Ayanwale, Musa Adekunle, From platform to pedagogy: reimagining student engagement in the digital learning landscape, Cogent Education, 12, 1, (2025)
3 Hybrid Flexible Course Design, (2019)
4 Bond, Melissa, Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1, (2020)
5 Bozan, Karoly, Student Engagement in the HyFlex and Online Classrooms: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic, Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29, 1, pp. 509-536, (2024)
6 Technium Social Sciences Journal, (2023)
7 Chen, Liling, Designing Online Discussion for HyFlex Learning, International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8, 1, pp. 191-198, (2022)
8 CHIU, Thomas K.F., Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54, S1, pp. S14-S30, (2022)
9 Chung, Ellen, Online learning readiness among university students in Malaysia amidst Covid-19, Asian Journal of University Education, 16, 2, pp. 45-58, (2020)
10 Research Methods in Education, (2007)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers