Article 2025

Implementing inclusive (I)VET: challenges and opportunities in liberal skill formation systems

Journal of Vocational Education and Training
Journal
Abstract

Vocational education and training (VET) provides skills to young people at risk of social exclusion and efficiently integrates them into labour markets. In addition to structural-institutional factors identified in the field of comparative political economy, this article illustrates that the success of the social inclusion function of VET depends on policy design and implementation. The article analyses the potential of initial VET (IVET) to contribute to social inclusion in a least likely case of a liberal skill formation system: Scotland. Empirically, the analysis is based on reviews of policy documents and reports and interviews with key actors. Quantitative data is used to validate claims and support the findings. The analysis shows that (I)VET policy implementation is hindered by features typical of liberal skill formation systems, though through novel mechanisms uncovered in the analysis. The analysis also uncovers previously unidentified operational challenges. Notwithstanding, the article concludes that high level (I)VET is a viable alternative to academic study, even in unfavourable structural-institutional contexts, and that policy updating serves to maintain inclusivity. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Social inclusion school-to-work transitions policy implementation Initial vocational education and training policy design skill formation systems

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Otto Suhr Institute of Political Science, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
European Social Fund Plus, ΕΚΤ
FAs were co-funded by the Scottish Government (through SDS) and the European Social Fund until 2020\u201321. During this period, colleges had to dedicate significant resources to meeting compliance requirements and were awarded funding when pupils reached milestones e.g. upon registration, after three months\u2019 participation and upon completion. Owing to dropouts before meeting milestones, there were discrepancies in the resources committed by colleges and the funds awarded. A college may organise, promote and recruit for an FA but later be unable to deliver it because of dropouts, or deliver to much reduced numbers of pupils, thereby limiting the value on investment. On the positive side, some colleges found SDS funding to be flexible and access to additional resources to cover travel costs for pupils (e.g. travel between school and college or between school and work placements) was welcomed. Since 2020\u201321 colleges have been funded by SFC the same way they are funded for delivering FE courses \u2013 SDS continues to fund municipalities and ITPs delivering FAs. As such, the change in funding model has directly affected only colleges. While some colleges have viewed this change positively, finding it easier to deliver within established funding mechanisms (COL5, COL6), others have viewed it negatively, stating that it has resulted in increased compliance, less freedom in what they deliver and an associated reduction in capacity to deliver FE courses which may be more financially viable (COL1, COL3, COL4). There was universal agreement that the loss of the additional travel funds negatively impacts participation and the capacity to deliver work placements.
References 10 References
1 Technical Report, (2014)
2 Ballantyne, Steven, Spaces of subsidiarity: A comparative inquiry into the social agenda of Cohesion Policy, Social Policy and Administration, 58, 4, pp. 605-620, (2024)
3 Billett, Stephen Richard, The standing of vocational education: sources of its societal esteem and implications for its enactment, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 66, 1, pp. 1-21, (2014)
4 Bol, Thijs, Educational systems and the trade-off between labor market allocation and equality of educational opportunity, Comparative Education Review, 57, 2, pp. 285-308, (2013)
5 Bonoli, Giuliano, The limits of decentralized cooperation: promoting inclusiveness in collective skill formation systems?, Journal of European Public Policy, 28, 2, pp. 229-247, (2021)
6 Busemeyer, Marius Raphael, Skills and inequality: Partisan politics and the political economy of education reforms in Western Welfare States, Skills and Inequality: Partisan Politics and the Political Economy of Education Reforms in Western Welfare States, pp. 1-309, (2014)
7 Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation, (2011)
8 Caves, Katherine Marie, Getting there from here: a literature review on vocational education and training reform implementation, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 73, 1, pp. 95-126, (2021)
9 Chevalier, Tom, Fighting youth unemployment: Growth strategies and youth welfare citizenship, Growth and Welfare in Advanced Capitalist Economies: How Have Growth Regimes Evolved?, pp. 348-371, (2021)
10 Creating Cooperation how States Develop Human Capital in Europe, (2003)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers