Article Gold Open Access 2025

Role of teaching assistants as affective mediators supporting social–emotional project-based service learning

Frontiers in Medicine
Journal · Vol. 12 · Art. 1685566
Abstract

Background: Social–emotional learning (SEL) is crucial to the development of professional identity and collaborative competence in medical education. However, research exploring how teaching assistants (TAs) act as affective mediators to support SEL in project-based service-learning (PjBL-SL) is lacking. The present study investigated two research questions: (1) How do the roles and facilitation strategies adopted by TAs in PjBL-SL influence the development of medical students’ SEL competencies? and (2) How do TAs interpret students’ SEL growth trajectories during the course? Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in a required PjBL-SL course at a Taiwanese medical school. In August 2022, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 TAs. Thematic analysis was used to examine their observations and strategies to support student SEL competency development. Results: The TAs reported observing substantial student growth across all five SEL competencies defined by the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making. The TAs described how students engaged in perspective-taking, reflective practice, and collaborative problem-solving. The TAs viewed themselves as affective mediators, providing emotional safety, attentive feedback, and tailored guidance throughout the learning process. A dual-layer TA support system—consisting of precourse training grounded in the sequenced, active, focused, explicit principles and ongoing in-course reflective dialogue—was a key enabler of this emotional support role. Conclusion: TAs in PjBL-SL courses are crucial to supporting medical students’ SEL competency development by offering emotionally attuned, context-sensitive guidance. This study’s dual-layer model of TA preparation and engagement can enhance the emotional dimensions of learning in medical curricula. © © 2025 Liao, Hung, Chen, Chen, Ting and Chang.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Experiential learning health professions education social and emotional learning affective mediation project-based service learning SAFE instructional framework student support strategies teaching assistants

Index Keywords

learning adult female human male medical education Decision making Article awareness Thematic analysis Problem solving qualitative research self concept education medical profession medical student semi structured interview experiential learning emotional support self care educational support facilitation Taiwanese teaching assistant
Author Affiliations
China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
National Taichung University of Education, Taichung, Taiwan
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Wigelsworth, Michael, Making a Case for Core Components: New Frontiers in SEL Theory, Research, and Practice, School Psychology Review, 53, 5, pp. 593-606, (2024)
2 Measuring Sel Using Data to Inspire Practice, (2019)
3 Frye, Katherine E., Content Analysis of the CASEL Framework Using K–12 State SEL Standards, School Psychology Review, 53, 3, pp. 208-222, (2024)
4 Handbook of Social and Emotional Learning Research and Practice, (2015)
5 Casel Guide Effective Social and Emotional Learning Programs, (2013)
6 Casel Guide for Schoolwide Social and Emotional Learning, (2015)
7 Handbook of Social and Emotional Learning Research and Practice, (2015)
8 Mahoney, Joseph L., Systemic Social and Emotional Learning: Promoting Educational Success for All Preschool to High School Students, American Psychologist, 76, 7, pp. 1128-1142, (2021)
9 Hsu, Weichin, Tickling the heart: integrating social emotional learning into medical education to cultivate empathetic, resilient, and holistically developed physicians, Frontiers in Medicine, 11, (2024)
10 Journal of Problem Based Learning, (2020)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers