This study examines the link between thinking styles; legislative, executive, and judicial, and students perceived motivation in digital creativity education. Guided by Sternberg's Mental Self-Government Theory and Keller's ARCS model, it compares learner-paced (DVC-LS) and system-paced (DVC-SS) instructional approaches. Findings reveal that legislative thinkers show greater intrinsic motivation in learner-paced settings, while executive and judicial thinkers respond better to structured, system-paced environments. The results highlight the importance of aligning instructional design with learners' cognitive styles to enhance motivation and engagement in digital creativity education. This alignment can support more personalized, effective learning experiences and inspire sustained interest in creative digital tasks. © 2026 by IGI Global Scientific Publishing. All rights reserved.
Author Keywords
Index Keywords