Conference paper 2006

How much can (or should) we push self-direction in introductory materials science?

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
Conference
Abstract

A capacity for self-directed, life-long learning is often cited as a critical skill for tomorrow's engineers. The student response to high levels of self-directed learning, however, is not always positive, particularly in introductory level courses. Some students enthusiastically embrace the control over their learning in open-ended situations. Other students, however, become frustrated and disheartened, and ask to be returned to a comfortable state of structure, guidance, and traditional learning. The self-directed knowledge acquisition in technical disciplines has historically been a controversial approach that deserves our close examination, as some students cite self-direction as a positive contributor to learning, while others report decreases in learning due to student control. In this paper, we explore the issues surrounding student directed learning in a project-based introductory materials science course. We present preliminary data on the student responses to open-ended projects and self-guided learning, with particular emphasis on the development of and changes in attitudes and self-perceptions of learning throughout the semester. Possible causes of student responses to self-directed learning are considered, and particular attention is focused on student comfort in self-directed environments and its relation to learning processes. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2006.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Learning systems Curricula Students Project management Engineers Student response Open-ended projects Materials science Introductory materials science Semesters
Author Affiliations
Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering, Needham, MA, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Green Report Engineering Education for A Changing World, (1994)
2 Engineering Education Designing an Adaptive System, (1995)
3 Gijselaers, Wim H., Connecting problem-based practices with educational theory, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996, 68, pp. 13-21, (1996)
4 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, (2001)
5 Systemic Engineering Education Reform an Action Agenda, (1995)
6 Foundations of Problem Based Learning, (2004)
7 Facilitating Problem Based Learning Illuminating Perspectives, (2003)
8 Smith, Karl A., Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices, Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1, pp. 87-101, (2005)
9 undefined
10 Dym, Clive L., Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning, Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1, pp. 103-120, (2005)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-85029045896
  • Language English