Article 2006

An exploration of the relationship between academic and experiential learning approaches in vocational education

British Journal of Educational Psychology
Journal · Vol. 76 · Issue 1 · pp. 155-169
Abstract

Background. Research on individual learning approaches (or learning styles) is split in two traditions, one of which is biased towards academic learning, and the other towards learning from direct experience. Aims. In the reported study, the two traditions are linked by investigating the relationships between school-based (academic) and work-based (experiential) learning approaches of students in vocational education programs. Samples. Participants were 899 students of a Dutch school for secondary vocational education; 758 provided data on school-based learning, and 407 provided data on work-based learning, resulting in an overlap of 266 students from whom data were obtained on learning in both settings. Methods. Learning approaches in school and work settings were measured with questionnaires. Using factor analysis and cluster analysis, items and students were grouped, both with respect to school- and work-based learning. Results. The study identified two academic learning dimensions (constructive learning and reproductive learning), and three experiential learning dimensions (analysis, initiative, and immersion). Construction and analysis were correlated positively, and reproduction and initiative negatively. Cluster analysis resulted in the identification of three school-based learning orientations and three work-based learning orientations. The relation between the two types of learning orientations, expressed in Cramér's V, appeared to be weak. Conclusions. It is concluded that learning approaches are relatively context specific, which implies that neither theoretical tradition can claim general applicability. © 2006 The British Psychological Society.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

learning human questionnaire Humans Article educational status Vocational education Factor Analysis, Statistical factorial analysis Questionnaires
Author Affiliations
Department of Educational Sciences, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, Department of Educational Sciences, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Department of Educational Sciences, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Team Policy Research and Development, CINOP, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Biggs, John B., Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes, Higher Education, 8, 4, pp. 381-394, (1979)
2 Workplace Pedagogic Practices Participatory Practices and Individual Engagement, (2003)
3 Boekaerts, Monique, Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students, Learning and Instruction, 7, 2, pp. 161-186, (1997)
4 Boyle, Elizabeth A., Learning styles and academic outcome: The validity and utility of Vermunt's inventory of learning styles in a British higher education setting, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 2, pp. 267-290, (2003)
5 British Journal of Educational Psychology, (1998)
6 Cornwell, John M., Factor Analysis of the 1985 Revision of Kolb's Learning Style Inventory, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 2, pp. 455-462, (1991)
7 Entwistle, Noël J., Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment - Introduction to the Special Issue, Higher Education, 22, 3, pp. 201-204, (1991)
8 Understanding Student Learning, (1983)
9 Geiger, Marshall A., A factor analysis of kolb's revised learning style inventory, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 3, pp. 753-759, (1992)
10 Statistical Applications for the Behavioral Sciences, (1993)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
46
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers