Article 2006

Why do dentists struggle with removable partial denture design? An assessment of financial and educational issues

British Dental Journal
Journal · Vol. 200 · Issue 5 · pp. 277-281
Abstract

Aim: Published studies in the international dental literature illustrate that the quality of prescription and fabrication of cobalt-chromium removable partial dentures (CCRPDs) by general dental practitioners frequently fail to comply with ethical and legal requirements. The reasons cited for this in the past have broadly related to either financial or educational issues. The aim of this investigation is to determine the effect of financial and educational factors on the quality of CCRPD design and fabrication by general dental practitioners. Materials and methods: This investigation was completed in two parts. (1) A pre-piloted pro-forma was distributed to a number of dental laboratories throughout the UK and Ireland. These sought information relating to the quality of written instructions for CCRPDs received by these laboratories, and details of the remunerative scheme under which they were being provided. Three categories of remunerative scheme were considered, private CCRPDs in Ireland, private CCRPDs in the UK, and CCRPDs being provided by salaried NHS practitioners. (2) A pre-piloted questionnaire was distributed to vocational dental practitioners in the UK and Ireland. This sought information relating to their attitudes, opinions, and educational and clinical experiences of CCRPD design and fabrication. Results: (1) Three hundred completed pro-formas were returned from dental laboratories, 100 of which related to each of the three remunerative schemes. Poor or no written instructions were provided in 47% (n = 47) of CCRPD cases funded privately in the UK, 46% (n = 46) of CCRPD cases funded privately in Ireland, and 50% (n = 50) of CCRPDs being provided by salaried NHS practitioners. (2) One hundred and seven completed questionnaires were returned from vocational trainees. Vocational dental practitioners had completed fewer CCRPDs during VT than in dental school (dental school: median = 4, inter-quartile range = 3 to 5; VT: median = 2, inter-quartile range = 1 to 4). One-fifth of respondents (n = 22) had not completed any CCRPDs during VT. Nine per cent of VT practices (n = 10) had a surveyor on their premises. Only 15% (n = 16) of respondents felt the time they had spent in VT had increased their confidence in the design of CCRPDs. Conclusion: Financial factors did not have as significant an effect on the quality of prescription and fabrication of CCRPDs as did educational factors. Serious deficiencies in the teaching of CCRPDs during vocational training were identified. © British Dental Journal 2006.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

human medical education Humans Internship and Residency Article education general practice United Kingdom economics clinical practice health personnel attitude Attitude of Health Personnel standard dentistry prescription Ireland laboratory prosthodontics private practice Great Britain General Practice, Dental State Dentistry denture tooth prosthesis Denture Design Laboratories, Dental chromium derivative dental alloy Chromium Alloys Dental Alloys Dentist's Practice Patterns Denture, Partial, Removable Prescriptions, Non-Drug
Author Affiliations
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University College Cork, Cork, Munster, Ireland
Funding & Acknowledgements
Botanical Society of the British Isles, BSBI
The assistance of the British Society for the Study of Prosthetic Dentistry who provided funding for this investigation through their Research Award is acknowledged. The authors would like to sincerely thank the assistance of the various dental laboratories, and Directors of Vocational Training, who participated in this investigation. For reasons of confidentiality, these must remain anonymous.
References 10 References
1 Lynch, Christopher D., A survey of chrome-cobalt RPD design in Ireland, International Journal of Prosthodontics, 16, 4, pp. 362-364, (2003)
2 Lynch, Christopher D., Quality of materials supplied to dental laboratories for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in Ireland., The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry, 11, 4, pp. 176-180, (2003)
3 Lynch, Christopher D., Quality of written prescriptions and master impressions for fixed and removable prosthodontics: A comparative study, British Dental Journal, 198, 1, pp. 17-20, (2005)
4 Öwall, Bengt E., Design of removable partial dentures and dental technician education., Svensk tandlakare tidskrift. Swedish dental journal, 67, 1, pp. 21-32, (1974)
5 Dullabh, H. D., Partial denture prosthodontic procedures employed by practising graduates of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg., The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa = Die Tydskrif van die Tandheelkundige Vereniging van Suid-Afrika, 48, 3, pp. 129-134, (1993)
6 Vult von Steyern, P., Removable partial denture design habits in general dental practice in Sweden., Swedish dental journal, 19, 5, pp. 205-211, (1995)
7 Wolfaardt, John F., Removable partial denture design in Alberta dental practices., Journal (Canadian Dental Association), 62, 8, pp. 637-644, (1996)
8 Stafford, G. Derek, A comparison of some aspects of dental technology in commercial laboratories in England and Sweden., Swedish dental journal, 6, 2, pp. 81-86, (1982)
9 Hardy, F., A critique of materials submitted by dentists to dental laboratories for the fabrication of removable partial dentures., Quintessence of dental technology, 7, 2, pp. 93-95, (1983)
10 Cotmore, John M., Removable partial denture survey: Clinical practice today, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 49, 3, pp. 321-327, (1983)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
46
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers