Article 2007

Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice
Journal · Vol. 14 · Issue 3 · pp. 281-294
Abstract

The paper reports on the findings of a Learning and Skills Research Centre (LSRC) funded study investigating the impact of different modes and methods of assessment on achievement and progress in post-secondary education and training. Data were collected across Advanced-level academic and vocational preparation programmes in schools and colleges, work-based training, and adult education settings. The paper reports that clarity in assessment procedures, processes and criteria has underpinned widespread use of coaching, practice and provision of formative feedback to boost achievement, but that such transparency encourages instrumentalism. It concludes that the practice of assessment has moved from assessment of learning, through assessment for learning, to assessment as learning, with assessment procedures and practices coming completely to dominate the learning experience and ‘criteria compliance’ replacing ‘learning’. © 2007 Taylor & Francis.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Assessment in Education, (1998)
2 Black, Paul J., Learning how to learn and assessment for learning: A theoretical inquiry, Research Papers in Education, 21, 2, pp. 119-132, (2006)
3 Competency Based Education and Training, (1989)
4 Assessment as Learning Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning, (2003)
5 Journal of Education and Work, (2003)
6 Gipps, Caroline V., Socio-cultural aspects of assessment, Review of Research in Education, 24, pp. 355-392, (1999)
7 Curriculum 2000, (2003)
8 James, David, Going underground? Learning and assessment in an ambiguous space, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 55, 4, pp. 407-422, (2003)
9 James, Mary E., Beyond method: Assessment and learning practices and values, Curriculum Journal, 17, 2, pp. 109-138, (2006)
10 James, Mary E., Learning how to learn, in classrooms, schools and networks: Aims, design and analysis, Research Papers in Education, 21, 2, pp. 101-118, (2006)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
325
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers