Article 2025

A community for expertise development–South African vocational colleges and their internal and external social characteristics

Journal of Vocational Education and Training
Journal · Vol. 77 · Issue 1 · pp. 101-120
Abstract

In recent decades, reforms of technical and vocational education and training (TVET) systems have mostly focused on the needs of employers to produce graduates ready for the labour market. The academic literature has extensively criticised the narrow focus on the performance of work tasks at the expense of other types of knowledge in the curriculum. In our paper, we reflect on the evidence that a curriculum that delivers the appropriate development of expertise can be associated with colleges that incorporate certain social characteristics. These characteristics were found in the way colleges deliberately build collaborative relationships internally through teamwork, conflict resolution among their disciplinary experts, and externally through partnerships with employers. In addition, those colleges externally mediated employer’s skills expectations of students and internally translated the curriculum. Our analysis is based on a study of well-resourced vocational colleges in South Africa, two of which emerged as successful, in contrast to one college that failed to contribute to the appropriate professional development of its students which differed in that the latter lacked these social characteristics. Thus, in addition to resources as an appropriate precondition, we argue that the development of expertise is strongly related to how vocational colleges manifest their social characteristics. © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Vocational college community of practice expertise development social characteristics

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Institute of Education, University of Derby, Derby, Derbyshire, United Kingdom
Institute for Post-School Studies, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, Western Cape, South Africa
Funding & Acknowledgements
National Research Foundation, NRF
The writing of this article was partially supported by the National Research Foundation SARCHI Chair: TVET studies. We are grateful to the participants who gave generously of their time to provide detailed explanations of teaching and learning processes. The paper initially emerged as a discussion between colleagues, and we appreciated the guidance of Joy Papier, Leesa Wheelahan, Volker Wedekind and Martin Johnson in moving our ideas forward. The reviewers made thoughtful suggestions that improved the paper substantially, and we thank them for their insights.
References 10 References
1 System of Professions an Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, (1988)
2 Abbott, Andrew, The New Occupational Structure: What are the questions?, Work and Occupations, 16, 3, pp. 273-291, (1989)
3 Allais, Stephanie Matseleng, The changing faces of the South African national qualifications framework, Journal of Education and Work, 24, 3-4, pp. 343-358, (2011)
4 Allais, Stephanie Matseleng, Claims vs. practicalities: Lessons about using learning outcomes, Journal of Education and Work, 25, 3, pp. 331-354, (2012)
5 Alphonsus, Naomi Sumangala, Unit standards to occupational qualifications: South African vocational policy reform stuck in reverse, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 74, 1, pp. 107-125, (2022)
6 Occupational Qualifications the Elusive Quest to Connect Education and Work, (2023)
7 Bwp@ Spezial 19 Retrieving and Recontextualising Vet Theory, (2023)
8 Common Practices Emerging in Ongoing and Complete Occupational Learning Programmes, (2024)
9 Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Traditions, (1998)
10 Professionalism the Third Logic, (2001)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers