Article Gold Open Access 2008

The effect of practical experience on perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approach, and learning outcomes

Learning and Instruction
Journal · Vol. 18 · Issue 2 · pp. 172-186
Abstract

Does authentic assessment or the perception of it affect how students study and learn? Does practical experience affect how assessment authenticity is perceived? And does practical experience influence how an authentic assessment affects student learning? Mixed methods design yielded insight into the answers to these questions. This article presents the results of a study on the relationships between authenticity perceptions of different cohorts of students, who differed in the amount of practical experience, their study approach and their perceived degree of professional skill development. The results showed some salient differences in how freshman- and senior-student groups perceive the same authentic assessment and how this assessment influences their learning. These results suggest possible guidelines for developing and using authentic assessments during a curriculum in which learning and working are intertwined. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Vocational education work-based learning Authentic assessment student perceptions Study approach

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Educational Technology Expertise Center, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands
Educational Technology Expertise Center, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands, Research Centre Learning in Interaction, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Educational Technology Expertise Center, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands, Institute for Educational Science and Media Research, FernUniversität in Hagen, Hagen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Baartman, Liesbeth K.J., The wheel of competency assessment: Presenting quality criteria for competency assessment programs, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 2, pp. 153-170, (2006)
2 Biemans, Harm J.A., Competence-based vet in the netherlands: Background and pitfalls, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 56, 4, pp. 523-538, (2004)
3 Biggs, John B., Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment, Higher Education, 32, 3, pp. 347-364, (1996)
4 Study Process Questionnaire Manual, (1987)
5 Biggs, John B., The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F, The British journal of educational psychology, 71, pp. 133-149, (2001)
6 Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements Learning Processes and Prior Knowledge, (1996)
7 Optimising New Modes of Assessment in Search of Qualities and Standards, (2003)
8 Professional Learning Gaps and Transitions on the Way from Novice to Expert, (2004)
9 Boud, David J., Assessment and the Promotion of Academic Values, Studies in Higher Education, 15, 1, pp. 101-111, (1990)
10 Assessment for Learning in Higher Education, (1995)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
88
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers