Book chapter 2009

Developing skills for collaborative, relational research in higher education: A cultural historical analysis

Pedagogy in Higher Education: A Cultural Historical Approach
Journal · pp. 181-197
Abstract

There has been a growing trend for higher education to be seen by the state as central to national economic success (cf Barnett, 1990; Brown, Lauder,&Ashton, 2011). In the process, the state, in many countries, such as the United Kingdom, has sought to influence higher education research and there are growing demands for universities to be more accountable for addressing the concerns of contemporary society. These demands are also reflected in changing relationships between researchers and the fields they investigate, as academics respond to calls for experts, such as university researchers, to integrate what they know now with what those who are practice-based want to do in the future (Lundvall&Archibugi, 2001). There is, therefore, a growing expectation, in the social sciences as well as science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subject areas, that university-based researchers will increasingly work in collaborative ways with external organisations, such as commercial companies or other university-based research laboratories, to generate and test new knowledge at practice boundaries with potential end users (Gibbons et al., 1999), often involving co-configuration work, a form of knowledge creation that requires continuous expert-user interaction and active user involvement in designing new products and services (Victor&Boynton, 1996). However, such emphases set up a noticeable tension about the nature and purpose of academic research. Some university researchers react by embracing the new expectations that they collaborate across subject boundaries, becoming either more ‘user oriented’ (Gibbons et al., 1999; Rickinson, Sebba,&Edwards, 2011) or open to interdisciplinary work; whilst others react by pointing to the importance of preserving the right to inner dedication (Bernstein, 2000). The reality, we suspect, is that most academic researchers strive to find a balance between pure and applied research, while embracing the opportunity to communicate aspects of their work to a wider public audience and to provide advice to policy makers. © Gordon Wells and Anne Edwards 2013.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Department of Public and Business Administration, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Alvesson, Mats, ORGANIZATIONS AS RHETORIC: KNOWLEDGE‐INTENSIVE FIRMS AND THE STRUGGLE WITH AMBIGUITY, Journal of Management Studies, 30, 6, pp. 997-1015, (1993)
2 Social Life of Things Commodities in Cultural Perspective, (1986)
3 Idea of Higher Education, (1990)
4 Bechky, Beth A., Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor, Organization Science, 14, 3, pp. 312-350, (2003)
5 Human Capital A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, (1964)
6 Pedagogy Symbolic Control and Identity Theory Research Critique, (1996)
7 Stem Graduates in Non Stem Jobs Bis Research Paper Number 30, (2011)
8 Work Process Knowledge, (2002)
9 High Skills Globalization Competitiveness and Skill Formation, (2001)
10 Global Auction the Broken Promises of Education Jobs and Incomes, (2011)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers