Article 2009

Funding for equity and success in English further education colleges, 1998-2003

Oxford Review of Education
Journal · Vol. 35 · Issue 1 · pp. 57-79
Abstract

'Incorporation' in Further Education in England and Wales centralised policy control and implemented a per-pupil funding formula that promoted equity, in that colleges were paid more for enrolling 'disadvantaged' students, and for performance, in that funding was contingent on retention and student success rates. This article analyses the impact of funding policy on student success rates for adults in general further education colleges using five years of student-level administrative data from 1998/99 to 2002/03. Results from descriptive statistics show that student success rates rose by 10% during the five-year period, with the largest gains made by ethnic minorities, adult basic education students, and students from disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Logistic regression results mirror the descriptive statistic results but find especially strong gains for adult basic education students and students receiving additional learning support funding.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
Higher Education Funding Council for England
Funding text 1: Before incorporation, colleges were funded through a combination of local property taxes and block grants from the national government to local education authorities. These districts were responsible for hiring and firing, curriculum design, financial administration, and allocation of funds to individual colleges (McLure, 2000). Incorporation in 1993 moved control of policymaking from the local districts to the central government. The Further Education Funding Council (FEFC) was created to allocate funding and inspect colleges. The FEFC devised a per-pupil funding formula, first implemented in the 1993/94 academic year, in which funding followed individual students to whatever college they decided to attend, essentially creating a national voucher system.; Funding text 2: Additional learning support (ALS) is funding for support in addition to what is normally provided in a standard learning programme (Further Education Funding Council, 2000). ALS funding facilitates the employment of specialist staff including additional teachers to reduce class size (used especially in ABE), personal care assistants, mobility assistants, readers, note-takers, and educational psychologists (Further Education Funding Council, 2001).
References 10 References
1 Choice Pathways and Transitions Post 16 New Youth New Economies in the Global City, (2000)
2 A Revolution in Social Policy, (1998)
3 Cope, Stephen, Regulating the new governance, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 55, 2, pp. 183-208, (2003)
4 Closing the Achievement Gap Colleges Making A Difference, (2001)
5 Research Making A Difference Student Retention and Achievement London Learning and Skills Development Agency, (2001)
6 Differential Achievement What does the ISR Profile Tell Us, (2000)
7 undefined, (2009)
8 undefined, (2009)
9 Funding Additional Learning Support, (2003)
10 Evaluation of the Additional Support Mechanism, (2000)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
3
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers