Article Green Open Access 2011

Why are higher education participation rates in Germany so low? institutional barriers to higher education expansion

Journal of Education and Work
Journal · Vol. 24 · Issue 1 · pp. 49-68
Abstract

Countries around the world have witnessed educational expansion at all levels, leading to the massification of tertiary education and training. Tertiary education has become a major factor of economic competitiveness in an increasingly science-based global economy and a key response to shifts in national labour markets. Within the EU, the reform of skill formation systems has been advanced by the Lisbon strategy, with the Bologna and Copenhagen processes in higher education (HE) and vocational education and training (VET) articulating and diffusing overarching goals in European skill formation. If European benchmarks call for at least 40% of all 30- to 34-year-olds to hold a tertiary-level certificate, Germany exhibits a relatively low proportion of each cohort entering HE and attaining that qualification level (28%). We analyse this 'German exceptionalism', locating a range of factors in the educational system: The institutional logic of segregation, the structure of secondary schooling, the division or schism between the organisational fields of VET and HE, and limited permeability throughout. Regardless of isomorphic pressures that led Germany to quickly implement undergraduate bachelor's (BA) and graduate master's (MA) courses of study, these factors limit the extent of HE expansion visible among other European countries. © 2011 Taylor & Francis.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Vocational training Higher education Germany Educational expansion Europeanisation

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Research Unit Skill Formation and Labor Markets, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fur Sozialforschung, Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG
This research was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG) for the Project ‘Internationalization of Vocational and Higher Education Systems in Transition (INVEST)’. For helpful comments, we thank David Baker, Nadine Bernhard, Lukas Graf, John Meyer, Reinhard Pollak and Alessandra Rusconi, the participants of the INVEST workshop held at WZB in July 2010, and the reviewers.
References 10 References
1 Andersen, Robert, Education and occupational status in 14 countries: The role of educational institutions and labour market coordination, British Journal of Sociology, 61, 2, pp. 336-355, (2010)
2 Bildung in Deutschland 2008 2010, (2008)
3 Sofi Mitteilungen, (2006)
4 Berufsbildung Im Umbruch Signale Eines Uberfalligen Aufbruchs, (2007)
5 Baker, David P., The educational transformation of work: Towards a new synthesis, Journal of Education and Work, 22, 3, pp. 163-191, (2009)
6 Baker, David P., Socialist ideology and the contraction of higher education: Institutional consequences of state manpower and education planning in the former east Germany, Comparative Education Review, 51, 3, pp. 353-377, (2007)
7 Baker, David P., The institutional crisis of the German research university, Higher Education Policy, 21, 1, pp. 49-64, (2008)
8 New Arenas of Educational Governance, (2007)
9 Datenreport Zum Berufsbildungsbericht 2009 Data Summary of the Vocational Education and Training Report 2009, (2009)
10 Schaubilder Zur Berufsbildung Charts and Graphs on Vocational Education and Training, (2010)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
101
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers