Article Gold Open Access 2011

Exploring differences in patient mix in a cohort of GP trainees and their trainers

BMJ Open
Journal · Vol. 1 · Issue 2 · Art. e000318
Abstract

Background: During specialty training for general practice, trainees acquire the required competencies through work-based learning. Previous small-scale and older studies suggest that the patient mix of general practitioner (GP) trainees differs from that of their trainers: trainees are exposed to more minor illnesses, and fewer chronic diseases and severe conditions, which may influence the development of their competency. Research question: What are the differences in the patient mix between trainees and trainers? Methods: 49 first-and 24 third-year trainees and their trainers (n=114) were included in the study. International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) contact and diagnosis codes were extracted from electronic patient records over 6 months. Results: Trainers had double the number of face-toface consultations, and treble the number of telephone consultations compared with trainees. The trainees' patient mix consisted of significantly more patients with eye diseases, ear diseases, respiratory diseases, skin diseases and minor illnesses compared with their trainers. Trainers encountered significantly more patients with circulatory diseases, psychiatric diseases, metabolic diseases, male genital conditions, social problems, and chronic and oncological diseases. Female trainers and trainees encountered almost twice the number of female conditions compared with their male counterparts, while for male conditions, the opposite was found. Discussion: Considerable differences between the patient mix of trainers and trainees were found. Specialty trainers and teachers must be aware of areas of low exposure. Trainers should ensure trainees handle more chronic, complex, psychosocial and circulatory conditions.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of General Practice, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Dolmans, Diana H.J.M., The impacts of supervision, patient mix, and numbers of students on the effectiveness of clinical rotations, Academic Medicine, 77, 4, pp. 332-335, (2002)
2 Tim Dornan, Tim L., What can experience add to early medical education? Consensus survey, BMJ, 329, 7470, (2004)
3 van der Zwet, Jonne, Workplace learning in general practice: Supervision, patient mix and independence emerge from the black box once again, Medical Teacher, 32, 7, pp. e294-e299, (2010)
4 Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the M D Degree
5 Standards for GP Specialty Training Guidance to Deaneries, (2008)
6 Accreditation of Specialist Medical Education and Training and Professional Development Programs Standards and Procedures, (2011)
7 Postgraduate Medical Education Wfme Global Standards for Quality Improvement, (2003)
8 van Diest, Rob, Growth of knowledge in psychiatry and behavioural science in a problem-based learning curriculum, Medical Education, 38, 12, pp. 1295-1301, (2004)
9 Verhoeven, Bas H., Growth of medical knowledge, Medical Education, 36, 8, pp. 711-717, (2002)
10 Engels, Paul T., Learning styles of medical students, general surgery residents, and general surgeons: Implications for surgical education, BMC Medical Education, 10, 1, (2010)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
25
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers