Article 2012

Claims vs. practicalities: Lessons about using learning outcomes

Journal of Education and Work
Journal · Vol. 25 · Issue 3 · pp. 331-354
Abstract

The idea of learning outcomes seems to increasingly dominate education policy internationally. Many claims are made about what they can achieve, for example, in enabling comparison of qualifications across countries, improving the recognition of prior learning and improving educational quality. The claims made for the role of learning outcomes rest on the assumption that outcomes can be transparent, or that they can capture or represent the essence of what a learning programme or qualification represents. But in practice, either learning outcomes are open to dramatically different interpretations, or they derive their meaning from being embedded in a curriculum. In both instances, learning outcomes cannot play the roles that are claimed for them. I draw on insights from South Africa, where learning outcomes were a major part of curriculum and education policy reform. I suggest that outcomes cannot disclose meaning within or across disciplinary or practice boundaries. They did not enable the essence of a programme to be understood similarly enough by different stakeholders and they did not facilitate judgements about the nature and quality of education and training programmes. Learning outcomes do not carry sufficient meaning, if they are not embedded in knowledge within a curriculum or learning programme. But if they are thus embedded, they cannot play the roles claimed for them in assisting judgements to be made across curricula and learning programmes. The notion of transparency (or even, a more moderate notion of sufficient transparency) which proved unrealisable in practice is the basis of nearly all the claims made about what learning outcomes can achieve. In addition, the South African experiences demonstrated how outcomes-based approaches can distort education and training programmes, and lead to practical complexities, which are a direct consequence of the need for transparency, and its impossibility, and not (although this was probably also the case) the product of 'poor implementation' in South Africa. © 2012 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

Keywords

Author Keywords

standards Outcomes-based education National qualifications frameworks

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Education Policy Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Bologna Seminar Learning Outcomes Based Higher Education the Scottish Experience, (2008)
2 Apples and Oranges A Comparison of School and College Subjects, (2006)
3 Rise and Fall of the Nqf A Critical Analysis of the South African National Qualifications Framework, (2007)
4 Allais, Stephanie Matseleng, Why the South African NQF failed: Lessons for countries wanting to introduce national qualifications frameworks, European Journal of Education, 42, 4, pp. 523-547, (2007)
5 Allais, Stephanie Matseleng, Education service delivery: The disastrous case of outcomes-based qualifications frameworks, Progress in Development Studies, 7, 1, pp. 65-78, (2007)
6 Learning from Africa Umalusi S Research Comparing Syllabuses and Examinations in South Africa with those in Ghana Kenya and Zambia, (2007)
7 Learning from the Early Starters, (2009)
8 Retrieving Teaching Critical Issues in Curriculum Pedagogy and Learning, (2010)
9 undefined, (2012)
10 F Word the Quality of the Fundamental Component of Qualifications in General and Further Education and Training, (2007)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
39
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers