Conference paper 2013

A study of learning effects in different cognitive styles in PBL animation course

Proceedings - 2013 2nd International Conference on Robot, Vision and Signal Processing, RVSP 2013
Conference · pp. 153-156
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore different cognitive styles of learning effects in PBL animation courses. This study used qualitative and quantitative research methods mixed in 12-week experimental learning courses. Also the teaching method was designed and based on both problem-based and project-based learning (PBL) approach, providing students with online learning, discussing, and sharing environment. In addition, in the end of course each group will complete a group project. At the beginning of the first class, a standardized test called "Groups Embedded Figure Test(GEFT)" was implemented to understand student's cognitive style. During the teaching period, student's learning process was recorded along with teacher's own reflection. The results of this study are as follows: Although no significant differences of learning effects between different cognitive styles, but there is a significant impact on student's work style. Also, the analysis of group projects shows that field-independent students can integrate more strategies in problem solving to complete group project than field-dependent students. © 2013 IEEE.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Teaching Teaching methods Students Project based learning Cognitive styles Animation Learning effects Signal processing Computer vision Quantitative research methods Standardized tests Experimental learning Field independents
Author Affiliations
Graduate Institute of Technological and Vocational Education, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Pingtung, Taiwan
Department of Visual Communication Design, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Ajayi, Lasisi, An exploration of pre-service teachers' perceptions of learning to teach while using asynchronous discussion board, Educational Technology and Society, 12, 2, pp. 86-100, (2009)
2 Chiu, Chiunghui, Group differences in computer supported collaborative learning: Evidence from patterns of Taiwanese students' online communication, Computers and Education, 54, 2, pp. 427-435, (2010)
3 Choi, Hyungshin, Applying an activity system to online collaborative group work analysis, British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 5, pp. 776-795, (2010)
4 Jermann, Patrick, Group mirrors to support interaction regulation in collaborative problem solving, Computers and Education, 51, 1, pp. 279-296, (2008)
5 Li, Liangyi, A coursework support system for offering challenges and assistance by Analyzing students' web portfolios, Educational Technology and Society, 12, 2, pp. 205-221, (2009)
6 Lim, Doohun, Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment, Educational Technology and Society, 12, 4, pp. 282-293, (2009)
7 Knowledge Quest, (2001)
8 Vinagre, Margarita, Politeness strategies in collaborative e-mail exchanges, Computers and Education, 50, 3, pp. 1022-1036, (2008)
9 Wang, Qiyun, Design and evaluation of a collaborative learning environment, Computers and Education, 53, 4, pp. 1138-1146, (2009)
10 Education, (1987)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers