Article 2025

What is informal workplace learning: a qualitative meta-synthesis

Journal of Workplace Learning
Journal · Vol. 37 · Issue 2 · pp. 171-193
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide a model for informal workplace learning. Despite the prevalence and recognized importance of informal learning in the workplace, scattered literature and different perspectives have caused a lack of shared understanding about its nature, and little research effort has been made in this direction so far. Design/methodology/approach: This paper identified the most significant components of informal workplace learning using the qualitative meta-synthesis method. For this purpose, after searching sources from different databases and screening them, 17 sources were selected due to compatibility with the research criteria. The texts extracted from the sources were analyzed using a thematic analysis method and synthesized using an aggregation approach. Finally, a themes network was created as a model with 8 main components and 11 sub-components. Findings: The results indicated that eight components were considered significant to informal workplace learning, including learning stimulus, awareness and intent to learn, action or experience, critical reflection on action, facilitators, collective learning, self-directed and context. Originality/value: This meta-synthesis contributes to the coherence and integration of the informal workplace learning literature. The obtained conceptual model, in addition to the general components of informal workplace learning, provides an explanation of the characteristics of each and the relationships between its components to achieve a complete understanding of the nature of informal workplace learning. Since no study has been done so far to comprehensively identify the most significant components of informal workplace learning, it is not possible to refer to their results in comparison with the results of this study. © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Keywords

Author Keywords

workplace learning qualitative informal learning

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Educational Management and Human Resource Development, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
Department of Curriculum Studies and Instruction, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
National Iranian Oil Company, Tehran, Iran
Department of Instructional Systems and Workforce Development, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Michael Wiese Productions, (1999)
2 Proceedings of the Adult Education Research Conference, (2012)
3 Billett, Stephen Richard, Workplace learning: Its potential and limitations, Education + Training, 37, 5, pp. 20-27, (1995)
4 Billett, Stephen Richard, Towards a model of workplace learning: The learning curriculum, Studies in Continuing Education, 18, 1, pp. 43-58, (1996)
5 Billett, Stephen Richard, Guided learning at work, Journal of Workplace Learning, 12, 7, pp. 272-285, (2000)
6 Billett, Stephen Richard, Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments, Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 6, pp. 312-324, (2004)
7 Boud, David J., The potential and paradox of informal learning, Informal Learning at Work: Triggers, Antecedents, and Consequences, pp. 131-152, (2018)
8 European Scientific Journal, (2015)
9 Carliner, Saul, Informai learning, The Cambridge Handbook of Workplace Training and Employee Development, pp. 585-606, (2017)
10 What is Informal Learning and What are Its Antecedents an Integrative and Meta Analytic Review, (2014)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers