Article 2015

Exploring selection and recruitment processes for newly qualified nurses: A sequential-explanatory mixed-method study

Journal of Advanced Nursing
Journal · Vol. 71 · Issue 1 · pp. 54-64
Abstract

Aim: To map current selection and recruitment processes for newly qualified nurses and to explore the advantages and limitations of current selection and recruitment processes. Background: The need to improve current selection and recruitment practices for newly qualified nurses is highlighted in health policy internationally. Design: A cross-sectional, sequential-explanatory mixed-method design with 4 components: (1) Literature review of selection and recruitment of newly qualified nurses; and (2) Literature review of a public sector professions' selection and recruitment processes; (3) Survey mapping existing selection and recruitment processes for newly qualified nurses; and (4) Qualitative study about recruiters' selection and recruitment processes. Methods: Literature searches on the selection and recruitment of newly qualified candidates in teaching and nursing (2005-2013) were conducted. Cross-sectional, mixed-method data were collected from thirty-one (n = 31) individuals in health providers in London who had responsibility for the selection and recruitment of newly qualified nurses using a survey instrument. Of these providers who took part, six (n = 6) purposively selected to be interviewed qualitatively. Results: Issues of supply and demand in the workforce, rather than selection and recruitment tools, predominated in the literature reviews. Examples of tools to measure values, attitudes and skills were found in the nursing literature. The mapping exercise found that providers used many selection and recruitment tools, some providers combined tools to streamline process and assure quality of candidates. Conclusions: Most providers had processes which addressed the issue of quality in the selection and recruitment of newly qualified nurses. The 'assessment centre model', which providers were adopting, allowed for multiple levels of assessment and streamlined recruitment. There is a need to validate the efficacy of the selection tools. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Recruitment Nursing selection Mixed-method design Newly qualified nurses Workforce issues

Index Keywords

human Humans Personnel selection information processing personnel management nurse Nurses Data collection
Author Affiliations
University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom
Barchester Healthcare, London, United Kingdom
South London and Maudsley Eating Disorder Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Andrews, Gavin J., Improving first-destination recruitment: Nursing students' perceptions of three initiatives in London, England, Journal of Nursing Management, 13, 4, pp. 345-355, (2005)
2 Barbour, Rose S., Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog?, British Medical Journal, 322, 7294, pp. 1115-1117, (2001)
3 People Management, (2008)
4 10 Questions to Help You Make Sense of Qualitative Research, (2025)
5 Nursing Education Today
6 Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, (2007)
7 Cleary, Michelle L., Recent graduate nurse views of nursing, work and leadership, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22, 19-20, pp. 2904-2911, (2013)
8 Edge the Latest Information for the Education Practitioner, (2007)
9 Cubit, Katrina A., Tailoring a Graduate Nurse Program to meet the needs of our next generation nurses, Nurse Education Today, 31, 1, pp. 65-71, (2011)
10 Cummins, Ann Maria, Clinical supervision: The way forward? A review of the literature, Nurse Education in Practice, 9, 3, pp. 215-220, (2009)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
8
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers