Article 2015

The development and empirical validation of the Q-PDN: A questionnaire measuring continuing professional development of nurses

Nurse Education Today
Journal · Vol. 35 · Issue 1 · pp. 232-238
Abstract

Background: Although separate studies among nurses have been conducted into their continuing professional development (CPD) motives, importance attached to CPD, conditions deemed needed for CPD, and actual CPD activities undertaken, these variables have not yet been investigated at the same time, on the same sample. Objectives: The aim of this study is to report on the development and initial psychometric testing of the Q-PDN, a questionnaire measuring several aspects of CPD among nurses. Method: Based on a survey administered to 1329 nurses in hospitals in the Netherlands, a multi-dimensional instrument for CPD was validated. The constructs 'CPD motives', 'CPD importance', 'CPD conditions', and 'CPD activities undertaken' were established through factor analyses. Results: Reliability analyses showed satisfactory to good Cronbach's alpha scores on all factors, ranging from 70 to 89. Conclusion: Using this instrument can stimulate and support CPD of nurses, which has been shown to contribute to increasing the quality of care. Human resource development (HRD) professionals, educators in healthcare, and managers can use this questionnaire to gain insight in the extent to which nurses undertake CPD activities, in the importance they attribute to CPD activities, in the conditions they deem necessary to participate in CPD, and in the motives that they have to engage in CPD. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Nurses Questionnaire continuing professional development instrument development Psychometric validation

Index Keywords

adult female human male procedures questionnaire Humans Surveys and Questionnaires psychometry education nursing education health personnel attitude Attitude of Health Personnel Educational Measurement reproducibility validation study nurse Nurses Reproducibility of Results Netherlands statistical model Education, Nursing, Continuing Psychometrics Models, Statistical
Author Affiliations
Department of Human Resource Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands
Department of Research and Education, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
HRM and Healthcare Research Group, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Standards for Professional Development, (2000)
2 Bahn, Dolores, Orientation of nurses towards formal and informal learning: Motives and perceptions, Nurse Education Today, 27, 7, pp. 723-730, (2007)
3 Bally, Jill M.G., The role of nursing leadership in creating a mentoring culture in acute care environments, Nursing Economics, 25, 3, pp. 143-149, (2007)
4 Berings, Marjolein G.M.C., The development and validation of the on-the-job learning styles questionnaire for the nursing profession, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58, 5, pp. 480-492, (2007)
5 Brekelmans, Gerard, Factors influencing continuing professional development: A Delphi study among nursing experts, European Journal of Training and Development, 37, 3, pp. 313-325, (2013)
6 Cooper, Elizabeth Elliott, Creating a culture of professional development: A milestone pathway tool for registered nurses, Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 40, 11, pp. 501-508, (2009)
7 Scale Development Theory and Applications, (1991)
8 Du Boulay, Claire E.H., From CME to CPD: Getting better at getting better?: Individual learning portfolios may bridge gap between learning and accountability, BMJ, 320, 7232, pp. 393-394, (2000)
9 Ellis, Lorraine Betty, Illuminating continuing professional education: Unpacking the black box, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42, 1, pp. 97-106, (2005)
10 Flanagan, Jean, Work-Based Learning as a means of developing and assessing nursing competence, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 9, 3, pp. 360-368, (2000)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
13
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers