Article 2025

The Profile of Students' Mathematical Computational Thinking Process in Terms of Self-Efficacy

Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal
Journal · Vol. 17 · Issue 1 · pp. 213-231
Abstract

Computational thinking is an essential ability for students in the 21st century. Therefore, this study described students' mathematical computational thinking process in terms of self-efficacy of eighth graders, consisting of 32 students. The applied instruments were self-efficacy questionnaires, computational thinking ability tests, and interview guidelines. The results of the questionnaire were grouped into three categories, namely high, moderate, and low self-efficacy. A student was selected for each category as the respondent using the purposive sampling method. The data were analyzed with the Miles and Huberman model, starting from reduction, presentation, and conclusions. The computational thinking process is indicated by the stages of abstraction, representation, decomposition, algorithms, and evaluation. The results of the research analysis showed that the computational thinking process of students in the self-efficacy category was high and moderately fulfilling the five stages well and informatively. In addition, there needs to be an emphasis and increase in cognitive activity at the representation stage, especially in students with low self-efficacy. The representation stage helps students to get initial ideas for solving problems. This will have a further impact on the achievement of the algorithm stage in the computational thinking process. Based on these findings, the study is recommended to design five stages of the computational thinking process. Future research can develop the steps of the computational thinking process in solving contextual problems. © 2025 City University of New York. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

self-efficacy computational thinking process thinking process

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Purwokerto, Indonesia
Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon, West Java, Indonesia
Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Funding & Acknowledgements
Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, UMP
The authors are grateful to the Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, and Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang for partaking in the study process.
Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, UNISSULA
The authors are grateful to the Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, and Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang for partaking in the study process.
References 10 References
1 European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, (2022)
2 Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, (2018)
3 Aminah, N., Computational Thinking Process of Prospective Mathematics Teacher in Solving Diophantine Linear Equation Problems, European Journal of Educational Research, 11, 3, pp. 1495-1507, (2022)
4 Seminar Nasional Bahasa Sastra Seni Dan Pendidikan Dasar Sensaseda, (2021)
5 Bartimote-Aufflick, Kathryn M., The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy, Studies in Higher Education, 41, 11, pp. 1918-1942, (2016)
6 Bekhet, Abir K., Methodological triangulation: An approach to understanding data, Nurse Researcher, 20, 2, pp. 40-43, (2012)
7 Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education, (2016)
8 Budiharso, Teguh, Improving quality education through better working conditions of academic institutes, Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7, 1, pp. 99-115, (2020)
9 Literasi Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, (2020)
10 International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, (2021)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-105005976324
  • Language English