Article 2015

Employees’ perceptions of barriers to participation in training and development in small engineering businesses

Journal of Workplace Learning
Journal · Vol. 27 · Issue 7 · pp. 561-578
Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to investigate barriers to employee participation in voluntary formal training and development opportunities from the perspective of employees in small engineering businesses. Design/methodology/approach – An exploratory qualitative methodology involving data collection via site visits and in-depth semi-structured interviews with 20 employees in five small engineering businesses was used. Interviews explored the role of developmental proactivity and employees’ perceptions of conditions in the immediate work environment and industry sector that represent barriers to their participation in formal training and development. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings – Three key findings are as follows. First, proactive behaviour regarding access to external training and development is muted in small business settings because of strong resource allocation norms. Second, factors in the internal work environment rather than the industry sector constitute the major barriers to training and development. Third, owner-managers and employees appear to have significantly differing perspectives of barriers to training and development. Research limitations/implications – The findings suggest avenues for future research. These include examining how workplace norms influence employee behaviour with regard to accessing formal training and development and investigating the learning strategies that employees use to compensate for a lack of access to training and development. Originality/value – Research into relatively low levels of employee participation in formal training and development in small businesses is deficient because it predominantly involves surveys of owner-managers’ opinions. This study is novel because it seeks to generate new insights not previously articulated by employees. The study yielded four propositions that have practical and research implications. © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Keywords

Author Keywords

barriers small business Training and development Employee perspective Proactive behaviour Workplace norms

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
School of Business, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Ahlgren, Linda, Lifelong learning through SMEs: Exploring workplace learning in the UK, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 23, 5, pp. 331-348, (2011)
2 Social Learning Theory, (1977)
3 Billett, Stephen Richard, Workplace learning: Its potential and limitations, Education + Training, 37, 5, pp. 20-27, (1995)
4 Billett, Stephen Richard, Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments, Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 6, pp. 312-324, (2004)
5 Bishop, Dan, The importance of being an insider: How networks influence the small firm's engagement with formal training, Journal of European Industrial Training, 35, 4, pp. 326-344, (2011)
6 Blume, Brian D., Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review, Journal of Management, 36, 4, pp. 1065-1105, (2010)
7 Colquitt, Jason A., From the editors: Publishing in AMJ - Part 1: Topic choice, Academy of Management Journal, 54, 3, pp. 432-435, (2011)
8 Cooper, William H., The strong situation hypothesis, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 1, pp. 62-72, (2009)
9 Academy of Management Review, (1980)
10 DeFillippi, Robert J., Introduction: Project-based Learning, Reflective Practices and Learning Outcomes, Management Learning, 32, 1, pp. 5-10, (2001)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
20
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers