Article Gold Open Access 2015

The effects of strength-based versus deficit-based self-regulated learning strategies on students’ effort intentions

Motivation and Emotion
Journal · Vol. 39 · Issue 5 · pp. 656-668
Abstract

In two randomized experiments, one conducted online (n = 174) and one in the classroom (n = 267), we tested the effects of two types of self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies on students’ intentions to put effort into professional development activities: strength-based SRL strategies (i.e., identifying perceived relative strengths and, subsequently, selecting professional development activities to further improve those strengths) versus deficit-based SRL strategies (i.e., identifying perceived relative shortcomings and, subsequently, selecting professional development activities to improve those shortcomings). Across both studies, analysis of variance revealed that, relative to students who used deficit-based SRL strategies, students who used strength-based SRL strategies were higher in perceived competence, intrinsic motivation, and effort intentions. Moreover, the results of multi-mediator analysis and structural equation modeling supported the hypothesis that the effect of strength-based versus deficit-based SRL strategies on students’ effort intentions was sequentially mediated by perceived competence and intrinsic motivation. Implications for the application of self-regulated learning strategies in the context of professional self-development are discussed. © 2015, The Author(s).

Keywords

Author Keywords

Intrinsic motivation professional self-development self-regulated learning strategies Effort intentions Perceived competence

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Psychology, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Dissertation Abstracts International, (2005)
2 Badami, Rokhsareh, Feedback after good versus poor trials affects intrinsic motivation, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 2, pp. 360-364, (2011)
3 Self Efficacy the Exercise of Control, (1997)
4 Baron, Robert Alan, Negative Effects of Destructive Criticism: Impact on Conflict, Self-Efficacy, and Task Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 2, pp. 199-207, (1988)
5 Baumeister, Roy F., Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles?, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement, 4, 1, (2003)
6 Boekaerts, Monique, Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students, Learning and Instruction, 7, 2, pp. 161-186, (1997)
7 Boggiano, Ann K., Children's Preference for Challenge: The Role of Perceived Competence and Control, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1, pp. 134-141, (1988)
8 Bolhuis, Sanneke M., Towards process-oriented teaching for self-directed lifelong learning: A multidimensional perspective, Learning and Instruction, 13, 3, pp. 327-347, (2003)
9 Bouskila-Yam, Osnat, Strength-based performance appraisal and goal setting, Human Resource Management Review, 21, 2, pp. 137-147, (2011)
10 Candy, Philip C., Reaffirming a proud tradition: Universities and lifelong learning, Active Learning in Higher Education, 1, 2, pp. 101-125, (2000)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
62
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers