Article Green Open Access 2015

Staying within or leaving the apprenticeship system? Revisions of educational choices in apprenticeship training

Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik
Journal · Vol. 235 · Issue 6 · pp. 539-552
Abstract

The decision to revise an educational choice has hardly been analyzed in previous research. Dropping out is only one possible choice, and we distinguish between dropping out (leaving the apprenticeship system) and changing or upgrading (staying within the apprenticeship system) as three possibilities to revise an educational decision, using a dataset that consists of apprentices who have dissolved their apprenticeship contract. We analyze the determinants of leaving apprenticeship training using competing risks models. Dropout decisions seem to be driven by financial considerations such as financial distress, but local labor market conditions seem to have no effect on them. Our findings underline the importance of distinguishing between the different choices instead of focusing exclusively on dropping out. © 2015, Walter de Gruyter GmbH. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Apprenticeship training human capital dropouts

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Business Administration, Universität Zürich, Zurich, ZH, Switzerland, Swiss Leading House on Economics of Education Firm Behavior and Training Policies, Switzerland
EastAsia International College, Yonsei University Mirae Campus, Wonju, Gangwon-do, South Korea
Funding & Acknowledgements
Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, IRLE
This study is partly funded by the Swiss Federal Office for Professional Education and Technology through its "Leading House on the Economics of Education: Firm Behaviour and Training Policies". We also wish to thank the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for financial support through a scholarship and the Institute for Research on Labor and Employment at the University of California, Berkeley, for its hospitality. Ed Lazear, Armin Schmutzler, Rainer Winkelmann, Tobias Caluori, Ines Pelger and Christian Pfeifer have given most helpful comments on an earlier version. We would also like to thank Alex Lefter for his valuable comments on this version. Finally, two anonymous referees and the editor have given excellent comments that improved the quality of this research considerably. We are extremely grateful to Klaus Schöngen at the German Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (BiBB) for providing us with the data set "Vertragslösungen 2002 - Strukturen und Gründe". Franziska Schoch has provided outstanding research assistance.
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, DAAD
This study is partly funded by the Swiss Federal Office for Professional Education and Technology through its "Leading House on the Economics of Education: Firm Behaviour and Training Policies". We also wish to thank the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for financial support through a scholarship and the Institute for Research on Labor and Employment at the University of California, Berkeley, for its hospitality. Ed Lazear, Armin Schmutzler, Rainer Winkelmann, Tobias Caluori, Ines Pelger and Christian Pfeifer have given most helpful comments on an earlier version. We would also like to thank Alex Lefter for his valuable comments on this version. Finally, two anonymous referees and the editor have given excellent comments that improved the quality of this research considerably. We are extremely grateful to Klaus Schöngen at the German Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (BiBB) for providing us with the data set "Vertragslösungen 2002 - Strukturen und Gründe". Franziska Schoch has provided outstanding research assistance.
Bundesamt für Berufsbildung und Technologie, BBT
This study is partly funded by the Swiss Federal Office for Professional Education and Technology through its "Leading House on the Economics of Education: Firm Behaviour and Training Policies". We also wish to thank the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for financial support through a scholarship and the Institute for Research on Labor and Employment at the University of California, Berkeley, for its hospitality. Ed Lazear, Armin Schmutzler, Rainer Winkelmann, Tobias Caluori, Ines Pelger and Christian Pfeifer have given most helpful comments on an earlier version. We would also like to thank Alex Lefter for his valuable comments on this version. Finally, two anonymous referees and the editor have given excellent comments that improved the quality of this research considerably. We are extremely grateful to Klaus Schöngen at the German Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (BiBB) for providing us with the data set "Vertragslösungen 2002 - Strukturen und Gründe". Franziska Schoch has provided outstanding research assistance.
References 10 References
1 Abbring, Jaap H., The unobserved heterogeneity distribution in duration analysis, Biometrika, 94, 1, pp. 87-99, (2007)
2 Determinanten Und Verbleib Von Ausbildungsabbrechern, (2003)
3 Sociological Methodology, (1982)
4 Journal of Political Economy, (1962)
5 Bishop, John H., The impacts of minimum competency exam graduation requirements on high school graduation, college attendance and early labor market success, Labour Economics, 8, 2, pp. 203-222, (2001)
6 Bradley, Steve W., Dropping out of post-compulsory education in the UK: An analysis of determinants and outcomes, Journal of Population Economics, 20, 2, pp. 299-328, (2007)
7 Datenreport Zum Berufsbildungsbericht 2013 Informationen Und Analysen Zur Entwicklung Der Beruflichen Bildung, (2013)
8 Nber Working Paper, (2000)
9 Nber Working Paper, (2006)
10 Applied Economics Quarterly, (2009)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
27
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers