Article 2016

Why co-design and delivery is "a no brainer" for higher and degree apprenticeship policy

Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning
Journal · Vol. 6 · Issue 4 · pp. 384-400
Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to contend that collaboration between employers and universities in the design and delivery of programmes of work-based study is an effective way to align the higher-level skills needs of employers with the aspirations of individuals who wish to gain university qualifications in the workplace. In mapping the fluctuations of UK higher-level skills policy through workforce development to degree apprenticeships it is argued that the facility for employers and universities to co-design and develop degree apprenticeship standards should be extended to the development of Higher Apprenticeships in England. Design/methodology/approach - The paper provides an analysis of a broad range of higher education (HE) skills related UK policy documents to map the fluctuations in policy that underpin the opportunities for employers and universities to collaborate in the design and delivery of HE programmes in England, including degree apprenticeships. Findings - It is noted that the approach to collaborative employer-university development signalled for degree apprenticeships described in policy documents unhelpfully perpetuates the presumed distinction between "academic learning" and "on the job training". However, it is also concluded that despite this, the rationale for co-design and delivery should equally apply to the development of all higher apprenticeships to ensure that the expertise that universities can bring in designing and assessing higher-level learning is not unnecessarily excluded from the process. Originality/value - This paper provides value through its analysis of how the fluctuations of HE and skills policy has affected the basis upon which employers and universities can collaborate in the design and delivery of work-based HE including higher and degree apprenticeships in England. It also seeks to inform HE policy and practice in the development of employer-responsive provision. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Workforce development work-based learning higher education policy Employer-university collaboration Hgher and degree apprenticeships Higher-level skills policy

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Institute for Work Based Learning, Middlesex University, London, United Kingdom
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed S., A review of the case of a levy-grant scheme (LGS) in the UK construction industry, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 62, 3, pp. 273-283, (2010)
2 Anderson, Adrian, The role of universities in higher apprenticeship development, Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 2, 3, pp. 240-255, (2012)
3 Measuring the Employer S Return Measuring the Employer S Return on Investments in Training Evidence from the Literature Industrial Relations, (2000)
4 Birds, Rachel, Leitch and higher education the impact and relevance of the review of skills, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 14, 1, pp. 7-11, (2010)
5 Bravenboer, Darryll Willem, Towards an integrated approach to the recognition of professional competence and academic learning, Education and Training, 58, 4, pp. 409-421, (2016)
6 Learning from Experience in Employer Engagement, (2011)
7 Bravenboer, Darryll Willem, Developing a transdisciplinary work-based learning curriculum: A model for recognising learning from work, Open Learning and Formal Credentialing in Higher Education: Curriculum Models and Institutional Policies, pp. 144-167, (2015)
8 Workman, Barbara A., Flexible frameworks and building blocks, Facilitating Work-based Learning: A Handbook for Tutors, pp. 52-72, (2015)
9 Independent Review of Higher Education Funding and Student Finance, (2010)
10 Bruneel, Johan, Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration, Research Policy, 39, 7, pp. 858-868, (2010)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
32
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers