Article 2016

Work-based learning through negotiated projects exploring learning at the boundary

Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning
Journal · Vol. 6 · Issue 1 · pp. 2-19
Abstract

Purpose-More collaborative and open learning models are suggested as part of the paradigm shift in the way knowledge is produced, distributed, and used. The purpose of this paper is to explore a work-based learning (WBL) model, based on systemic negotiations between actors from the three parties: the academy, the industry, and the students. The purpose is to investigate how teachers, supervisors, and students value negotiated WBL as a boundary activity and to enhance the understanding of the learning potential at the boundary. Design/methodology/approach-Activity theory is used as a lens to analyse the results from a survey to the three stakeholder groups and interviews of students. The four learning mechanisms are used to explore learning at the boundary between the two activity systems. Findings-Diversity and mobility in education and work addressed by the notion of boundary crossing are associated with both challenges and a learning potential. There is a constant dynamic between structure and agency, where structure, the negotiated model, influence the individual agency. When gradually removing scaffolding students can as boundary crossers engage behaviourally, emotionally, and cognitively and have agency to handle contradictions at a local level. However, they did not seem to prioritise both systems equally but instead they were gradually socialised into the activity system of the industry. Originality/value-When WBL is framed by a negotiated partnership it can manage and customise inherent conflicts of interest and enhance individual learning opportunities at the boundary and can be conceptualised as an open learning practice. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Keywords

Author Keywords

boundary crossing Placement learning work experience Activity system Learning at the boundary Open learning

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Economy and IT, Högskolan Väst, Trollhattan, Vastra Gotaland, Sweden
Department of Food Science, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
Department of Education, Göteborgs Universitet, Gothenburg, Vastra Gotaland, Sweden
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Akkerman, Sanne Floor, Boundary crossing and boundary objects, Review of Educational Research, 81, 2, pp. 132-169, (2011)
2 Akkerman, Sanne Floor, A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity, Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 2, pp. 308-319, (2011)
3 Alpert, Frank, Internships in marketing: Goals, structures and assessment - Student, company and academic perspectives, Australasian Marketing Journal, 17, 1, pp. 36-45, (2009)
4 Asia Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, (2009)
5 Organization Science, (1995)
6 Brett, Jeanne M., Culture and negotiation, International Journal of Psychology, 35, 2, pp. 97-104, (2000)
7 D’Antoni, Susan, Open educational resources: Reviewing initiatives and issues, Open Learning, 24, 1, pp. 3-10, (2009)
8 Dahlgren, Lars Owe, Interprofessional and problem-based learning: a marriage made in heaven?, Journal of interprofessional care, 23, 5, pp. 448-454, (2009)
9 Who Owns Learning Questions of Autonomy Choice and Control, (1995)
10 Learning by Expanding an Activity Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research, (1987)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
15
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers