Article Gold Open Access 2025

Perception and reaction of undergraduate critical disability studies students to six short films depicting neuro-advancements

NanoEthics
Journal · Vol. 19 · Issue 1 · Art. 6
Abstract

Advancements in neurosciences and neurotechnologies pose various ethical and social challenges, warranting public/stakeholder engagement. Art, such as short films, can expose audiences to the social aspects of neuro-advancements. The 2019 BIO·FICTION Film Festival, for instance, examined how neurotechnologies shape society, the human body, and mind. Students are one important group of stakeholders, as they are expected to be critical thinkers and change agents. The lived reality of disabled people is impacted by neuro-advancements in many ways. Critical disability studies students are therefore key stakeholders, as their programs and courses encourage them to identify and address social challenges faced by disabled individuals. Therefore, they need to be able to evaluate the social impacts of neuro-advancements. Few studies exist that ascertain the views of critical disability studies students on the social impact of neuro-advancements. Our study sought to amplify the voices of critical disability studies students by analyzing the responses of 89 undergraduates from three courses to six top films from the BIO·FICTION festival. Conducted asynchronously due to COVID restrictions, students watched the films independently and responded to four guiding questions about: a) general thoughts about the films, b) their perceived impact on those watching, c) implications for their anticipated careers involving disabled people, and d) the social impact of neuro-advancements on disabled people. Our findings indicated that the topical (non-)fictional short films effectively prompted students to reflect on the social aspects of neuro-advancements and were well received. However, responses also indicated a need for follow-up discussions – virtual or in-person – to address questions about film content and deepen the discussion and class engagement. Such discussion setups could also inform film festivals aiming to raise awareness about the societal implications of emerging technologies. © The Author(s) 2025.

Keywords

Author Keywords

students Arts stakeholder engagement Critical Disability Studies Disability Studies Disabled People Neuro-art Neuroethics Neurogovernance People with Disabilities

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada
Biofaction KG, Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada
Funding & Acknowledgements
Government of Canada
Funding text 1: This study was funded by the Government of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction ERN 155204 in cooperation with ERA-NET NEURON JTC 2017. It is also funded by the\u00A0Austrian Science Fund project FUTUREBODY: The Future of the Body in the Light of Neurotechnology (grant no. I 3752-B27).; Funding text 2: This study was funded by the Government of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction ERN 155204 in cooperation with ERA-NET NEURON JTC 2017. It is also funded by the Austrian Science Fund project FUTUREBODY: The Future of the Body in the Light of Neurotechnology (grant no. I 3752-B27).
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, CIHR
Funding text 1: This study was funded by the Government of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction ERN 155204 in cooperation with ERA-NET NEURON JTC 2017. It is also funded by the\u00A0Austrian Science Fund project FUTUREBODY: The Future of the Body in the Light of Neurotechnology (grant no. I 3752-B27).; Funding text 2: This study was funded by the Government of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction ERN 155204 in cooperation with ERA-NET NEURON JTC 2017. It is also funded by the Austrian Science Fund project FUTUREBODY: The Future of the Body in the Light of Neurotechnology (grant no. I 3752-B27).
Grant: ERN 155204
Funding text 1: This study was funded by the Government of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction ERN 155204 in cooperation with ERA-NET NEURON JTC 2017. It is also funded by the\u00A0Austrian Science Fund project FUTUREBODY: The Future of the Body in the Light of Neurotechnology (grant no. I 3752-B27).; Funding text 2: This study was funded by the Government of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction ERN 155204 in cooperation with ERA-NET NEURON JTC 2017. It is also funded by the Austrian Science Fund project FUTUREBODY: The Future of the Body in the Light of Neurotechnology (grant no. I 3752-B27).
Austrian Science Fund, FWF
Grant: 3752-B27
Funding text 1: This study was funded by the Government of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction ERN 155204 in cooperation with ERA-NET NEURON JTC 2017. It is also funded by the\u00A0Austrian Science Fund project FUTUREBODY: The Future of the Body in the Light of Neurotechnology (grant no. I 3752-B27).; Funding text 2: This study was funded by the Government of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction ERN 155204 in cooperation with ERA-NET NEURON JTC 2017. It is also funded by the Austrian Science Fund project FUTUREBODY: The Future of the Body in the Light of Neurotechnology (grant no. I 3752-B27).
Austrian Science Fund, FWF
Funding text 1: This study was funded by the Government of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction ERN 155204 in cooperation with ERA-NET NEURON JTC 2017. It is also funded by the\u00A0Austrian Science Fund project FUTUREBODY: The Future of the Body in the Light of Neurotechnology (grant no. I 3752-B27).; Funding text 2: This study was funded by the Government of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction ERN 155204 in cooperation with ERA-NET NEURON JTC 2017. It is also funded by the Austrian Science Fund project FUTUREBODY: The Future of the Body in the Light of Neurotechnology (grant no. I 3752-B27).
References 10 References
1 Kies, Alexander, Wired for work: brain-computer interfaces’ impact on frontline employees’ well-being, Journal of Service Management, 36, 1, pp. 1-26, (2025)
2 Brandt-Rauf, Paul W., Occupational Health and Neuroergonomics: The Future of Wearable Neurotechnologies at the Workplace, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 66, 6, pp. 456-460, (2024)
3 Gramann, Klaus, Editorial: Open science to support replicability in neuroergonomic research, Frontiers in Neuroergonomics, 5, (2024)
4 Seyfried, Günter, Pioneering neurohackers: between egocentric human enhancement and altruistic sacrifice, Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17, (2023)
5 AJOB Neuroscience, (2024)
6 Racine, Eric, Diversity in Neuroethics: Which Diversity and Why it Matters?, Neuroethics and Cultural Diversity, pp. 55-75, (2024)
7 Evers, Kathinka, Fundamental Neuroethics, Neuroethics and Cultural Diversity, pp. 37-54, (2024)
8 Jotterand, Fabrice, Neuroethics as an Anthropological Project, Neuroethics and Cultural Diversity, pp. 95-106, (2024)
9 Dubljević, Veljko, The Socio-Political Roles of Neuroethics and the Case of Klotho, AJOB Neuroscience, 13, 1, pp. 10-22, (2022)
10 Available Online, (2017)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers