Conference paper 2017

Professors' and students' perception of the advantages and disadvantages of project based learning

International Journal of Engineering Education
Journal · Vol. 33 · Issue 6 · pp. 1737-1750
Abstract

Requirements of the job market have substantially changed in the recent years while the teaching methods have remained largely the same. Employers find the graduates lacking in teamwork, communication and other soft skills as well as in engineering thinking, engineering intuition and higher order thinking and problem solving skills. Project based learning (PBL) appears to provide an alternative teaching process capable of addressing these employers' needs. The problem arises with implementation of PBL into existing engineering curricula, which are not flexible and easily changeable. Therefore, if full scale implementation of PBL courses is difficult, most significant advantages and barriers to implementation should be sought out. Goal of the paper was to discover the most significant advantages and disadvantages of PBLfrom the students' and professors' point of view. To that end, both students and professors were questioned on their perception of PBL from their own personal experience on a complex interdisciplinary student project. Taking into account the difference in sample sizes of the two groups, the students' opinions were collected through an online survey and the professors' through semistructured interviews and an ABC method questionnaire. Research findings from this paper may be used to determine which aspects of PBL are most suited for engineering education and conversely, which should be focused on the most. On the other hand, it is useful to know which disadvantages and barriers to implementation are the most significant and which need to be overcome first to enable PBL implementation. © 2017 TEMPUS Publications.

Keywords

Author Keywords

student perception Engineering education Project based learning Advantages Disadvantages and implementation barriers Faculty perception

Index Keywords

Teaching Engineering education Teaching methods Students Project based learning Problem solving education Student perceptions Job market Soft skills Surveys Advantages Faculty perceptions Implementation barriers Advantage Disadvantage and implementation barrier Engineering thinkings
Author Affiliations
Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Gradevinski Fakultet, Zagreb, Croatia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Morgan, Jim R., Engineering better projects, STEM Project-Based Learning an Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach, pp. 29-39, (2013)
2 Kanter, Rosabeth Moss, The new managerial work., Harvard Business Review, 67, 6, pp. 85-92, (1989)
3 Age of Unreason, (1989)
4 Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, (2003)
5 Chinowsky, Paul S., Developing knowledge landscapes through project-based learning, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 132, 2, pp. 118-124, (2006)
6 Journal of Engineering Education, (1997)
7 Systemic Engineering Education Reform an Action Agenda, (1997)
8 Quality Assurance in Undergraduate Education What the Public Expects, (1994)
9 Burlbaw, Lynn M., The project method in historical context, STEM Project-Based Learning an Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach, pp. 7-14, (2013)
10 Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, (1997)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
33
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-85037709338
  • Language English