Article Gold Open Access 2025

Recruiting help in everyday research work: Epistemic stance taking and accountability in interaction

Learning, Culture and Social Interaction
Journal · Vol. 51 · Art. 100890
Abstract

This study examines how novice researchers (master's and PhD students) independently initiate knowledge sharing and instructional activities in the midst of everyday research work. Approaching such activities as instances of help recruitment, the study draws on multimodal conversation analysis to describe how novices mobilize assistance from more experienced peers and supervisors. The interactional data was generated at a Physical Chemistry research program of a Swedish university, and consists of video-recordings of different spontaneous interactions at laboratories and shared offices, including a supervision meeting. The study focuses on recruitment sequences where help seekers refrain from displaying full lack of knowledge or skill. The analyses show how novices (1) use particular framings, such as “quick question”, and confirmation requests to particularize the scope of their problems and mitigate unknowing stances; (2) legitimize their requests for assistance by addressing their shared history with the recipient party; and (3) withhold direct requests in favor of producing accounts and displaying limited epistemic access, as if to “fish” for help. Through these methods, help seekers accountably frame and design their requests finely modulating epistemic stances, while constructing and upholding themselves as potential members of the scientific workplace, i.e., as researchers in training who need assistance at specific moments and regarding particular problems. By uncovering the intricate ways in which epistemic stance taking and issues of accountability relate to the accomplishment of help recruitment, the study also shows how novices address matters of autonomy and competence within apprenticeship situations. © 2025 The Author

Keywords

Author Keywords

Professional learning Accountability Epistemic stance Help recruitment Scientific workplaces

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Education, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
Funding & Acknowledgements
Uppsala Universitet, UU
I am deeply grateful to the participants of this video-ethnographic study for their kindness, patience, and generosity during my fieldwork. I also sincerely thank professors Helen Melander Bowden and Johanna Svahn, my doctoral supervisors, for their guidance and constructive feedback throughout the production of this manuscript. I would also like to acknowledge the insightful discussions and support from my colleagues in the CLIP research group (Studies in Childhood, Learning, and Identities as Interactional Practices) at Uppsala University, as well as the contributions from colleagues at data sessions held within the Samtalslabbet at Uppsala University and the TIM group (Talk, Interaction, and Multimodality) at Stockholm University.
Stockholms Universitet, SU
I am deeply grateful to the participants of this video-ethnographic study for their kindness, patience, and generosity during my fieldwork. I also sincerely thank professors Helen Melander Bowden and Johanna Svahn, my doctoral supervisors, for their guidance and constructive feedback throughout the production of this manuscript. I would also like to acknowledge the insightful discussions and support from my colleagues in the CLIP research group (Studies in Childhood, Learning, and Identities as Interactional Practices) at Uppsala University, as well as the contributions from colleagues at data sessions held within the Samtalslabbet at Uppsala University and the TIM group (Talk, Interaction, and Multimodality) at Stockholm University.
References 10 References
1 Benwell, Bethan, Constructing discussion tasks in university tutorials: Shifting dynamics and identities, Discourse Studies, 4, 4, pp. 429-453, (2002)
2 Bulpin, Kate J., The disciplining of scientific communities, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 38, 2, pp. 91-105, (2013)
3 Walker, Traci, Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 2, pp. 129-153, (2008)
4 Decker, Kris, Training scenes: Taking science studies to the classroom, Social Studies of Science, 53, 3, pp. 402-426, (2023)
5 Drew, Paul, What Drives Sequences?, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 1, pp. 61-68, (2012)
6 Drew, Paul, Epistemics in social interaction, Discourse Studies, 20, 1, pp. 163-187, (2018)
7 Requesting in Social Interaction, (2014)
8 Social Interaction Video Based Studies of Human Sociality, (2018)
9 Edwards, Derek, Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 4, pp. 347-373, (2000)
10 Filliettaz, Laurent, Asking questions ⋯ getting answers: A sociopragmatic approach to vocational training interaction, Pragmatics and Society, 2, 2, pp. 234-259, (2011)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers