Article Gold Open Access 2025

Identifying challenges of cultivating creativity in product design

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education
Journal · Vol. 14 · Issue 2 · pp. 1488-1495
Abstract

Creativity, a crucial skill in the fourth industrial revolution (IR4.0) is highly demanded in the workforce to drive innovation in product design. Therefore, it is important to cultivate creativity in product design through design and technology (D&T) education. However, many past studies encountered challenges regarding D&T teachers’ teaching creativity which might affect creativity cultivation among students. Thus, this article aims to identify the challenges faced by D&T teachers in cultivating student creativity within product design development. Utilizing the systematic literature review (SLR) method using reporting standards for systematic evidence syntheses (ROSES) in three databases, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Based on thematic analysis, this SLR leads to three themes: i) lack of pedagogical competence; ii) different thinking styles; and iii) lack of motivation. Addressing these challenges highlights the importance for educational institutions to align their curricula with current industry demands, ensuring students are well-prepared to tackle the complexities of contemporary product design. This effort requires collaboration among educators, industry leaders, and policymakers to update teaching methods, incorporate practical experiences, and enhance an environment that cultivates creativity. © 2025, Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

motivation Systematic literature review Design and technology Teacher competence Creativity challenge Creativity cultivation Product design

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
STEM Enculturation Research Centre, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
Funding & Acknowledgements
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM
The authors acknowledge the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) for funding under Geran Galakan Penyelidik Muda (GGPM) under the grant number GGPM-2022-019.
Grant: GGPM-2022-019
The authors acknowledge the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) for funding under Geran Galakan Penyelidik Muda (GGPM) under the grant number GGPM-2022-019.
References 10 References
1 Journal of Positive School Psychology, (2021)
2 Future of Jobs Report 2020, (2020)
3 van Laar, Ester, Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review, SAGE Open, 10, 1, (2020)
4 Higuera-Martínez, Oscar Iván, Fostering creativity in engineering through pbl, International Research Symposium on PBL, pp. 414-423, (2020)
5 McInerney, Dermot, Insights into product design students’ perception of, and engagement with, creativity in design education, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33, 3, pp. 1199-1219, (2023)
6 Kola, Malose Isaac, Using analytical rubrics to assess technological solutions in the technology classroom, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 2, pp. 883-904, (2022)
7 Kiong, Tee Tze, Design and technology teacher in tvet: A view on thinking style and inventive problem-solving skill, Journal of Technical Education and Training, 12, 1 Special Issue, pp. 197-203, (2020)
8 Wong, Yi Lin, Is there creativity in design? From a perspective of school design and technology in Hong Kong, Asia Pacific Education Review, 13, 3, pp. 465-474, (2012)
9 Amabile, Teresa M., The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning, Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, pp. 157-183, (2016)
10 International Journal of Social Sciences Educational Studies, (2017)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers