Article Green Open Access 2017

International consensus statement on the assessment of interprofessional learning outcomes

Medical Teacher
Journal · Vol. 39 · Issue 4 · pp. 347-359
Abstract

Regulatory frameworks around the world mandate that health and social care professional education programs graduate practitioners who have the competence and capability to practice effectively in interprofessional collaborative teams. Academic institutions are responding by offering interprofessional education (IPE); however, there is as yet no consensus regarding optimal strategies for the assessment of interprofessional learning (IPL). The Program Committee for the 17th Ottawa Conference in Perth, Australia in March, 2016, invited IPE champions to debate and discuss the current status of the assessment of IPL. A draft statement from this workshop was further discussed at the global All Together Better Health VIII conference in Oxford, UK in September, 2016. The outcomes of these deliberations and a final round of electronic consultation informed the work of a core group of international IPE leaders to develop this document. The consensus statement we present here is the result of the synthesized views of experts and global colleagues. It outlines the challenges and difficulties but endorses a set of desired learning outcome categories and methods of assessment that can be adapted to individual contexts and resources. The points of consensus focus on pre-qualification (pre-licensure) health professional students but may be transferable into post-qualification arenas. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

learning human procedures Humans Vocational education student Australia education leadership health practitioner human experiment educational model Models, Educational consultation licensing Education, Professional consensus cooperation public relations Cooperative Behavior Interprofessional Relations consensus development
Author Affiliations
School of Human Health and Social Sciences, CQUniversity Australia, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia
Health Institute for the Development of Education and Scholarship (Health IDEAS), Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Centre for Medical Education (CenMED), National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
School of Communication, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Department of Medical Education, University of Leicester, Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköpings Universitet, Linkoping, Östergötland, Sweden
College of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Sydney Interprofessional Declaration, (2010)
2 Medical Teacher, (2011)
3 Anderson, Elizabeth S., The Leicester model of interprofessional education: Developing, delivering and learning from student voices for 10 years, Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23, 6, pp. 557-573, (2009)
4 Medical Teacher, (2015)
5 Future of Medical Education in Canada Fmec A Collective Vision for MD Education, (2010)
6 Intern Training Term Assessment Form, (2014)
7 Education for Health, (1996)
8 Barr, Hugh, Mainstreaming interprofessional education in the United Kingdom: A position paper, Journal of Interprofessional Care, 20, 2, pp. 96-104, (2006)
9 Interprofessional Education Guidelines, (2016)
10 Teaching for Quality Learning, (2007)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
121
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers