Conference paper 2017

Highlighting and examining the importance of authentic industry examples in a workforce development certificate program

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
Conference · Vol. 2017-June
Abstract

The importance of authenticity has been examined in various aspects of education; this is especially true in the area of engineering education where most graduates will matriculate to industry. However, the importance of applied and authentic examples could be even more critical in workforce development programs. In these cases, students are often enrolled with a goal of using their acquired knowledge to advance their career or move into a new role. Purely theoretical or stylized examples would not be aligned with the educational goals of these students. As part of a National Science Foundation Advanced Technological Education grant, a certificate program in high value manufacturing (HVM) has been developed. The certificate program is a collaboration between a research intensive four-year institution and an urban community college. In this certificate program students will be taking courses in manufacturing processes, design, and other business-related subjects that are pertinent to the manufacture of low volume components that have high materials costs, stringent quality requirements, and critical project timelines. This unique content area requires example that comprise these pertinent aspects of HVM. This is particularly true of the five newly developed courses covering materials, project management, quality, logistics, and computer-aided design. While the analogous courses at a four-year degree granting institution would likely use stylized examples in these courses, this would not be preferable in an applied certificate program. This work discusses the acquisition and refinement of authentic and applied examples that are applicable to the HVM environment. Specifically, the use of industry contacts and the translation of examples into useable and appropriate examples are examined. These examples are detailed and compared to traditional stylized academic content. A methodology for examining student perceptions of these examples is also proposed. A discussion of the importance of authenticity in applied certificate programs is also presented. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2017.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Curricula Engineering education Workforce development Students education Student perceptions Project management Computer aided design Authentication Manufacturing process Advanced Technological Education National Science Foundations Manufacture Certificate programs High value manufacturing Quality requirements
Author Affiliations
Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
Houston Community College, Houston, TX, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
National Science Foundation, NSF
This material is supported by the National Science Foundation under DUE Grant Numbers 1501952 and 1501938. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations presented are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Division of Undergraduate Education, DUE
Grant: 1501938, 1501952
This material is supported by the National Science Foundation under DUE Grant Numbers 1501952 and 1501938. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations presented are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
References 10 References
1 Wang, Jyhwen, Enhancing and assessing life long learning skills through capstone projects, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, (2008)
2 Shuman, Larry J., The ABET "professional skills" - Can they be taught? Can they be assessed?, Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1, pp. 41-55, (2005)
3 Earnest, Joshua, ABET engineering technology criteria and competency based engineering education, Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2005, pp. D-7-D-12, (2005)
4 Johnson, Michael Deshawn, A method for assessing required course-related skills and prerequisite structure, European Journal of Engineering Education, 40, 3, pp. 297-308, (2015)
5 Dunlap, Joanna C., Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession, Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 1, pp. 65-83, (2005)
6 Pajares, Frank, Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings, Review of Educational Research, 66, 4, pp. 543-578, (1996)
7 Froyd, Jeffrey E., Problem-based learning and adaptive expertise, Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, (2011)
8 Wineburg, Sam S., Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts, Cognitive Science, 22, 3, pp. 319-346, (1998)
9 Transfer of Learning from A Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective, (2005)
10 Goiter, Paul, Comparing student experiences and growth in a cooperative, hands-on, active, problem based learning environment to an active, problem-based environment, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, (2007)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-85030554835
  • Language English